BeardedGingerWonder

Yeah, there could well be some shenanigans, but as you say we need actual experts doing actual analysis. Spreading wild conspiracy theories does nothing to help anyone.

Are you referring to the press release linked in the article, because it doesn't actually say those things.

Focussing further is just about the worst thing you can do - "secure erasure of digital footprints" is there a definition of what this is anywhere? Is there anything that suggests they were doing that on voting machines? Companies absolutely have a requirement to remove customer data on request in many jurisdictions - that would absolutely be covered by that statement. You're take a very narrow statement (which, again, doesn't appear to be in the linked press release) and blowing it up to meet the definition you want it to.

Right, do you see how this reads like conspiracy nonsense.

We make a claim, claim inherently says there's no way to prove it, so just trust us.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Just stop oil protestors are a lot easier to round up to be fair, generally being quite peaceful and significantly less likely to throw petrol bombs.

If you read the article they make it clear she's slamming them (and no this isn't a joke)

We don't, that's not our job. You don't just believe everything because it's hard to prove the opposite.

The first link is about voter suppression, nothing to do with the conspiracy.

Is it a joke if it's true?

So an archduke walks into a sandwich shop...

Reads like conspiracy nonsense. Bring receipts.

I suspect they've never seen a woman. On what scale would she be considered fat?

I like this perspective, it makes me think some anxious drivers are just more aware of how bad they are. I doubt they're much worse (and probably better) than the average new driver, but the lack of awareness in the average new driver probably covers the anxiety.