BarbecueCowboy
Seconding the request to share your work.
That is an amazing idea you've come up with that I never considered, but now I need it.
I can back this up with experience.
I'm actively running two piholes for years now. About 2/3rds of my traffic does go to the primary and some seem to 'lock on' to using just one, but most devices will swap between the two at their leisure.
It's a hard thing to talk about without coming across as inflammatory, especially considering the purpose of the building. I couldn't find many other pictures of it beyond that one, but it didn't seem like it had a lot going for it beyond the fact that a building serving that purpose had been at that site for 600 years.
I don't know what it is, but I haven't laughed this hard in awhile.
If you combine Cthulhu with nearly anything, only Cthulhu remains, but if you combine Cthulhu with King Kong, you get Cthulhu Kong.
From what I've heard, I think that is the officially accepted term from the community that most prefer, or am I behind the times?
People have tested them long term at this point. Outside of a few rare exceptions, there's not a noticeable difference in reliability between shucked drives and 'normal' drives. They're the same stock but just rebranded and have to be cheaper because they're marketed primarily for retail as opposed to enthusiast/enterprise who are willing to pay more.
I know for a fact they aren’t married
Do you really? Are you absolutely positive?
The behavior is still maybe not okay, but the rest kind of falls into place if their arrangement is more formal. It's weird to drive your ex-boyfriends car, it's less weird to drive the car of the husband you're currently separated from because it's also kinda your car too.
This is also kinda your best case scenario. It sounds like she's either secretly married and feels bad about not telling you earlier or you're just the side guy.
I kinda feel like the political uncertainty may not really factor in. Politically, it's possible that they may not exist once these are completed, but if they don't there isn't anyone in the government left to care.
It is such a shame that you have to jump through extra hoops to get a .cat domain. They could make so much money.
This is actually super super tricky.
So, there's an exemption for 'Transformative' art, and while this is obviously pretty shady, it feels like there's a good chance this would qualify as transformative. Basically, you can't copy an existing photograph you don't own, but you can take an existing person and paint a new original picture of them.
We had a big lawsuit just last year where the Supreme Court clarified the line a bit. In that case, the art was found to be not Transformative, but they did a lot to explain why, and based on that, this would be super likely to fall on the side of 'Legally Allowed'.
As someone who used to be a Java programmer, I can't make any sense of that statement.