What politician is going to anger the majority of their voters, and anger the lobbyists making them rich, to instead do the right thing and ensure poor people get housed?
If you owned a house worth $2Mn would you be OK with its value dropping to $800k if it meant all poor people in your city got a tiny house or condo? Additionally most people are Nimbys, so even the location of new housing is controversial.
The majority of the population either has a paid off home or is on a mortgage. No politician is going to alienate that voter base by building more housing. No matter how much it affects homeless people or the next generation of young adults.
The type of people who would make these changes are not the ones currently interested in running for election. Some one new would need to run but I'm not sure how you'd trust one person's empty promise over anothers.
Found this the easiest way to change it and it worked. This is going to make a decent difference to my daily quality of life.
Is there a way to have video links in lemmy open in revanced instead of YT on my phone?
Same boat. With kids it becomes really hard to find time to game for long periods. I look for games with short rounds. Halo infinite, SF6 etc.
Link to ad free version?
Street fighter 6. Pick Juri, Kimberly, Manon or more. With the new Dynamic control system, even your kids can easily play with you.
Beefy cheesy food in general really. Lasagna, pasta, work too.
Government doesn't need to fix the problem though. They just need to do enough to get reelected.
He is not Trump in diguise. He is the conservative equivalent of J Singh. Both these leaders have no actual policy and just knee jerk support whatever is popular in the moment. When Trump was popular he supported trumpism, now that it's no longer popular he changed his tune. He'll change his stance every day.