ApexHunter

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago

Of course it was American Airlines. Whenever you read a story about an airline doing something terrible to a passenger, odds are it will be them. I stopped flying on them a decade ago after a bad experience with power tripping flight crew, and every time I see a story like this I continue to not regret that decision.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

He screwed himself with that terrible exit out of the chicane.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

A six year old is not capable of the reasoning required to understand the full weight of the consequences of their actions. At that age most children still don't understand that death is permanent.

Motivation for performing that act would likely be driven by seeing it in media or games, which is content children that age shouldn't be exposed to. Not a stellar example of parenting, though we already knew the parents weren't awesome because they kept a loaded gun where a six year old could access it. Just because they see and imitate the act doesn't mean they understand it.

To answer your original question, if a child kills someone with a firearm, you go after the adult who gave the child access to it. Same as if the adult started spinning around in circles shooting randomly and killed someone.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Think different!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Please tell me you were hearing George Costanza's voice in your head as you wrote that...

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Stupid article. Lidar can't see lines painted on the road. Using lidar wouldn't have any impact on the described problem.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Nothing to do with Hamilton. Russell was following Norris's line. Norris clipped the wall before the corner. Russell clipped it at the same place, just a bit harder and broke the car. If he didn't break the car he would have gone around the corner just fine.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

He is allowed to move back up (before the braking zone) while leaving a car width on the outside.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Those "good" cops stand by and do nothing while watching the bad cops be bad. Even if they aren't going out and hurting people they are part of the problem by enabling that behavior.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

You assume that rulings would be consistent. If you read any of the recent decisions you will note plenty of hypocrisy and a decided lack of reasoning consistency in their written opinions. It is almost as if they are trying to justify a predetermined outcome...

So you'll see plenty of rulings in favor of things red states like and against things blue states like.

view more: ‹ prev next ›