Hate speech is not protected speech.
AnneBonny
joined 2 years ago
I changed my language. My intent was not to portray the action as being supported or condoned.
Would "permissible" be a better choice?
What’s the point of warrants if they’re boo longer needed?
If you give the police permission to conduct a search, they do not need a warrant.
This guy is a fucking crook. I thought they were going to disbar him.
I appreciate you're trying to keep people honest.
This is what is in the article:
On december[sic] 5th, for over five hours, lawmakers grilled the presidents of elite universities in a congressional hearing about antisemitism on college campuses. In one of the testiest exchanges a Republican congresswoman, Elise Stefanik, asked whether “calling for the genocide of Jews” violates university rules. It is “context-dependent”, replied Liz Magill, the president of the University of Pennsylvania. Clips of the exchange went viral on X, formerly Twitter. Yad Vashem, a Holocaust museum and research centre, issued a condemnation and stressed the importance of “raising awareness about the history of antisemitism and the Holocaust”.
I'm not sure what you think I am misrepresenting.
They don't know how to market something that doesn't have a bunch of gimmicky bullshit.