AnneBonny

It's not Nato, it's NATO isn't it?

I would support an affirmative action firearm ownership program.

I don't think that is how rights work.

I try to be nice to people asking questions.

edit: I mean, if you don't understand, and I didn't answer your question, please feel comfortable to ask more questions.

Do you need to explicitly include carve-outs or are those implicit?

If you have a law that says "a person cannot carry a gun in a courthouse", that would mean everyone, including police, cannot carry a gun in a courthouse. You can say, "felons cannot possess firearms." I guess that "exempts" people who are not felons implicitly.

Don’t laws just get interpreted with the constitution in mind, without having to be completely thrown out?

I'm not sure if I understand your question correctly. A portion of a law can be struck down without the whole law being struck down as unconstitutional.

It would invalidate every firearm regulation at the federal level. None of them include carve outs for militia.

It's a little like this:

Key & Peele - Office Homophobe
invidious link
youtube link

As written, the right to bear arms only applies to people who are in a well regulated militia.

The monkey paw curls. Gun control laws that do not exempt people who are in a well regulated militia are unconstitutional.

Can you explain why religion should have been a part of this discussion before someone else brought it up?

Spreading disinformation, especially about serious topics like economics, medicine, politics, religion, etc, needs to be cracked down on more. Posing as a professional online and spreading damaging info on purpose should result in jail time imo.

After four years of having Trump as president, how is it possible that you cannot see how dangerous ideas like this are?

You should do crossfit.