Agree that an 85% 'success' rate is nowhere near good enough.
Almacca
They can accept my anonymised digital driver's licence details or they can fuck off.
Anyone got an archive link to the story so I don't have to create a login?
The concern is how did the algorithm even see the video?
Yeah, it all seemed pretty unachievable/implausible to me as well, which was why I posted it here - for people to debunk it. Whether it's achievable or not, at the very least it does seem to be the direction the tech-bro dickheads are trying to push it, though.
We know! So what are we gonna do about it?
I like to listen to albums. I learned a long time ago that the best tracks are usually not the singles, or if they are, it's not really an artist I'll listen to.
I'm curious why you think Spotify's recommendations suck. You kind of have to train the algorithm first, but I've found lots of awesome bands I would never have heard of otherwise via the Discover Weekly playlist.
Men like Mr Rogers don't crave power, though. To quote Douglas Adams:
“The major problem—one of the major problems, for there are several—one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them. To summarize: it is a well-known fact that those people who most want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it. To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.”
He's right about being THE TALK OF THE WORLD. That would be true of any disaster of this scale.
Being able to levitate things with your mind trumps everything.
No God Particles were found.
We seem to be constantly hearing their opinions whether we want to or not anyway.