i am just pro-peace, i think they should live peacefully there should be no violence or settlers, weather it's arab settlers in kurdistan or orthodox jewish in west bank or gaza, or balck or white in africa
i am guessing you stick to watching one prespective? i used to be that way but found out it leads to dogmatism and close minded thinking
surely there must be some moderate beliefs between the two, from what i have seen there were in moderation
btw how did you access it? for me it stays deleted
oh ok
but does it have to be only robert conquest? surely others can have benificial contribution as well
https://www.rferl.org/a/RFERL_Interview_Robert_Conquest_Genocide_Famine/1357449.html
"But it was a definite attack on them [Ukrainians] as they were discriminated against as far as death went." This phrase directly conveys the intent to destroy a group, which is the core of the genocide definition.
Snyder, Timothy. Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin. Basic Books, 2010. (Snyder builds upon Conquest's work and largely affirms the genocidal intent).
Applebaum, Anne. Red Famine: Stalin's War on Ukraine. Doubleday, 2017. (Applebaum extensively cites and acknowledges Conquest's pioneering role, and her own work comes to a similar conclusion regarding genocide).
Sysyn, Frank E. "Thirty Years of Research on the Holodomor: A Balance Sheet." East/West: Journal of Ukrainian Studies. (how Conquest's work held up to new evidence and his continued stance).
yes it was acruitiqe of it