6daemonbag

I believe the first time I saw it, it didn't have the dog, and the setup was racist.

The Democratic party is an absolute mess here. They practically don't exist.

I think the entire platform would be happier if there was user-level power to easily block instances. Really hoping the devs consider it a priority.

While those are all accurate to me (except the bra) my main motivator is that I've passed my interaction threshold. It was quite fun, but I'm done now. Goodbye.

Just throwing it in there that I enjoy reading some hexbear posts. I'd rather unsub from stuff than remove my option to do so on my own

I saw that fmk post on Risa and I was mildly shocked. Even for lulz it's pretty bottom-of-the-barrel humor

Sync for Lemmy does as well. I've seen it go up to 1.5GB. I highly recommend running Cache Cleaner (FOSS) periodically.

Lucifer kinda looks like Bon Scott.. but naked

Yes I meant unbiased, but I was unsure if even using that word would be taken the wrong way. I don't want to be taken as a centrist or anything like that, because I'm not even close.

I just want a flat clinical review of what it says versus what it actually means without clickbait sensationalism. It is plainly bad, that much is obvious. But what are the real-life, bureaucratic implications of its potential execution?

Thanks for the link, I'll definitely check it out.

Just throwing it out there, those books are novelty trash. You're better off getting this.

Is there a neutral review of project 2025 that you can point to? That site is ass and either points to a book you can buy or a thousand links to PDFs.

TBH if people aren't more well adjusted than they were at any point in their past I'd be mildly to greatly disappointed.