I was thinking about doing something similar and was considering running Android on a Raspberry Pi. There are unofficial LineageOS builds for the Raspberry Pi. I haven't tried that yet, but I guess it should be possible to use the Jellyfin Android app on such a setup.
486
joined 2 years ago
Die grüne Plakette (4) bekommt man bereits für Benzin-Fahrzeuge mit Euro 1.
Unwahrscheinlich, da die Euro 4-Norm erst 2005 eingeführt wurde.
There is quite a significant difference. An ssh server - even when running on a non-default port - is easily detectable by scanning for it. With a properly configured Wireguard setup this is not the case. As someone scanning from the outside, it is impossible to tell if there is Wireguard listening or not, since it simply won't send any reply to you if you don't have the correct key. Since it uses UDP it isn't even possible to tell if there is any service running on a given UDP port.
I always found the software updates of AVM - the manufacturer of those "Fritz!Box"es - to be of questionable quality. If you take a look at the source code that they have to release upon request of the GPL'ed source code they use, you'll notice that they use ancient versions of the Linux kernel, Busybox and other tools. By ancient, I mean many years old, unsupported by upstream for years. Also, they only publish those sources manually when someone asks for them, which doesn't bode well for their internal development processes. If they used CI/CD pipelines, they could easily push out updates of those sources with every new release…
Awesome shot!
This thread has some interesting details as well: https://forums.raspberrypi.com/viewtopic.php?t=257144
There people managed to get idle power on a Raspberry Pi 4B to a little under 1.8 W. Interestingly, people there report that on their Pi 4's disabling USB doesn't do much. If I remember correctly, there were a few Pi 4 firmware updates that optimized power consumption over time. So the different firmware versions can behave differently when it comes to power consumption.
Your 2.3 W doesn't sound too bad to begin with. Certainly better than the 5 W mentioned in the article.
Sure! Shutting down certain peripherals can reduce power consumption. The biggest difference can usually be achieved by disabling the USB controller - this is also true for the Raspberry Pi 3 (although on the Pi 3 you would also lose access to the Ethernet controller). So if you don't use it, turn it off (and it looks like the author didn't use any of the USB ports, so this would have been an option). Even turning of the HDMI port saves a little bit of power - it makes a difference even if no display is attached. A tiny bit of power can also be saved by turning off the LEDs. I also tried lowering the CPU clock, but that didn't result in a noticable difference in idle power consumption.
At the moment I don't currently have a Pi 4 on hand to experiment with, but I do have a Raspberry Pi 4 Compute Module (CM4) on a very minimalistic carrier board and with that I am able to idle at about 1.3 W.
Always nice to see solar projects, although I wonder why the author didn't try to lower the Pi's power consumption. This would have been the first thing I would have done when trying to optimize things. 5 W is quite a lot for a Raspberry Pi and there are a couple of things one can do to lower its power consumption.
Getting certs from Let's Encrypt should work fine with any provider, even if you can't open any ports, since they do support DNS challenge.
OP mentioned $0.40/kWh, so that would be about $17 per year with a 5 W difference.
fwknopisn't susceptible to either.