Christie and Bush used to look like the worst politicians this country has to offer, but somehow they come out looking like saints versus the current GOP candidates. It's insane how far things have regressed since Trump took office.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Things haven't regressed; the mask has just come off.
This craziness has been around since I started paying attention back in 2008 with the tea party idiots.
The fact that they no longer feel the need to restrain themselves is what has regressed.
Very true - this element of the cons/GOP has been there for a very long time. There are/were plenty of cons/GOP that were butthurt about Nixon. Not about what Nixon did, but that it was reported on. Even when he resigned, he still had supporters. They were mad about Ronnie Raygun being caught in Iran/Contra, too, and they began lying at a rapid pace in the late 80s/early 90s to try to build him up into some kind of hero.
They have been working for decades to get revenge for these perceived slights and building alternative networks to give cover to future situations, such as donnie - see the hate radio network and the likes of Faux "News", as well as Regnery and online hate sites...
Anyone else think the word slam gets used too much? Its kind of lost its meaning, I'd like to see more creative words used like suplexes or RKO
Whatever happened to simply saying "insults?"
Christie insults Ramasmarmy.
Much better
I came here to say the same. It’s the most obnoxious word in headlines; it must be some sort of click-bait research result from the last few years.
Theres no creativity anymore, I bet most of it is AI spam these days. Most analysis is just surface-level, sometimes even just straight up wrong. The other one that drives me nuts is "this" where they try to get you to click on the link and rake in some ad revinue, I just hate ads so much it makes me do the oposite lol
I don't want creative journalists. I want objective reporting of facts (which you won't see from The Hill)
You know, I'm getting more and more tired of comments that complain about the phenomena than I am about the phenomena itself.
"And here comes Doug Bergham out of nowhere with the Rey Mysterio 619 around the podium."
Christie delivers a pile drive to Ramasaway
Headline: Blowhard calls Blowhard a Blowhard
"And I'm an obnoxious blowhard, so I would know."
Hardly. IMO that would be Trump. But, never fear Chris you're right in there.
Christie electric chair drops Ramaswamy, transitions to a leg-trap camel clutch: 'Biggest jabroni in America'
This wasn’t even on a major news outlet just some shanty town remake of Fox called News Crap or something like that.
Dollar general politicians is all we get from the right since at least the 50’s. What a waste of time and money these loser tramps are.
Christie is right to say this.
Except, Vivek is probably only second after the orange.
No, he's trailing way behind in polls after Trump, DeSantis, and Haley.
He's not getting the nomination, he's too annoying for even Republicans.
They're talking about levels of obnoxiousness, not position in the race.
He's not running for president, he's running for a position in Trump's cabinet, which is far worse.
Think you misunderstood the comment.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Chris Christie got into a fiery exchange with Vivek Ramaswamy during Wednesday night’s fourth GOP debate, calling out the entrepreneur and fellow White House contender for repeatedly interrupting and blasting him for his attacks against fellow candidate Nikki Haley.
So shut up for a little while,” Christie said during the event, hosted by The Hill’s sister news organization NewsNation.
When Ramaswamy interjected, Christie said, “You go out on the stump and you say something, all us see it on video, we confront you out on the debate stage.
Christie then came to the defense of Haley, who has repeatedly gotten into fiery back-and-forth exchanges with Ramaswamy over the last several debates.
Ramaswamy had once again launched broadsides against Haley in the opening of Wednesday night’s debate.
“Nikki and I disagree on some issues, but I’ll tell you this: I’ve known her for 12 years, which is longer than he’s even started to vote in the Republican primary.
The original article contains 341 words, the summary contains 157 words. Saved 54%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
He forgot about his old boss already?
Compared to OJ? Hm. Vivek is most definitely a ridiculous person, but the conservatives and the GOP has so many candidates for that title.