this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
120 points (92.9% liked)

politics

25208 readers
3047 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Chris Christie got into a fiery exchange with Vivek Ramaswamy during Wednesday night’s fourth GOP debate, calling out the entrepreneur and fellow White House contender for repeatedly interrupting and blasting him for his attacks against fellow candidate Nikki Haley.

“This is the fourth debate that you would be voted in the first 20 minutes as the most obnoxious blowhard in America. So shut up for a little while,” Christie said during the event, hosted by The Hill’s sister news organization NewsNation.

The former New Jersey governor had offered a summary of Ramaswamy’s stance on the Ukraine-Russia conflict, which Ramaswamy denied was correct.

“It’s exactly what you said. You do this at every debate,” Christie said.

When Ramaswamy interjected, Christie said, “You go out on the stump and you say something, all us see it on video, we confront you out on the debate stage. You say you didn’t say it, and then you back away.”

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 54 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Christie and Bush used to look like the worst politicians this country has to offer, but somehow they come out looking like saints versus the current GOP candidates. It's insane how far things have regressed since Trump took office.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Things haven't regressed; the mask has just come off.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

This craziness has been around since I started paying attention back in 2008 with the tea party idiots.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

The fact that they no longer feel the need to restrain themselves is what has regressed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Very true - this element of the cons/GOP has been there for a very long time. There are/were plenty of cons/GOP that were butthurt about Nixon. Not about what Nixon did, but that it was reported on. Even when he resigned, he still had supporters. They were mad about Ronnie Raygun being caught in Iran/Contra, too, and they began lying at a rapid pace in the late 80s/early 90s to try to build him up into some kind of hero.

They have been working for decades to get revenge for these perceived slights and building alternative networks to give cover to future situations, such as donnie - see the hate radio network and the likes of Faux "News", as well as Regnery and online hate sites...

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Anyone else think the word slam gets used too much? Its kind of lost its meaning, I'd like to see more creative words used like suplexes or RKO

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Whatever happened to simply saying "insults?"

Christie insults Ramasmarmy.

Much better

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I came here to say the same. It’s the most obnoxious word in headlines; it must be some sort of click-bait research result from the last few years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Theres no creativity anymore, I bet most of it is AI spam these days. Most analysis is just surface-level, sometimes even just straight up wrong. The other one that drives me nuts is "this" where they try to get you to click on the link and rake in some ad revinue, I just hate ads so much it makes me do the oposite lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I don't want creative journalists. I want objective reporting of facts (which you won't see from The Hill)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

You know, I'm getting more and more tired of comments that complain about the phenomena than I am about the phenomena itself.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

"And here comes Doug Bergham out of nowhere with the Rey Mysterio 619 around the podium."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Christie delivers a pile drive to Ramasaway

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago

Headline: Blowhard calls Blowhard a Blowhard

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago

"And I'm an obnoxious blowhard, so I would know."

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

Hardly. IMO that would be Trump. But, never fear Chris you're right in there.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

Christie electric chair drops Ramaswamy, transitions to a leg-trap camel clutch: 'Biggest jabroni in America'

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

This wasn’t even on a major news outlet just some shanty town remake of Fox called News Crap or something like that.

Dollar general politicians is all we get from the right since at least the 50’s. What a waste of time and money these loser tramps are.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Christie is right to say this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Except, Vivek is probably only second after the orange.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

No, he's trailing way behind in polls after Trump, DeSantis, and Haley.

He's not getting the nomination, he's too annoying for even Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

They're talking about levels of obnoxiousness, not position in the race.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

He's not running for president, he's running for a position in Trump's cabinet, which is far worse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Think you misunderstood the comment.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Chris Christie got into a fiery exchange with Vivek Ramaswamy during Wednesday night’s fourth GOP debate, calling out the entrepreneur and fellow White House contender for repeatedly interrupting and blasting him for his attacks against fellow candidate Nikki Haley.

So shut up for a little while,” Christie said during the event, hosted by The Hill’s sister news organization NewsNation.

When Ramaswamy interjected, Christie said, “You go out on the stump and you say something, all us see it on video, we confront you out on the debate stage.

Christie then came to the defense of Haley, who has repeatedly gotten into fiery back-and-forth exchanges with Ramaswamy over the last several debates.

Ramaswamy had once again launched broadsides against Haley in the opening of Wednesday night’s debate.

“Nikki and I disagree on some issues, but I’ll tell you this: I’ve known her for 12 years, which is longer than he’s even started to vote in the Republican primary.


The original article contains 341 words, the summary contains 157 words. Saved 54%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

He forgot about his old boss already?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Compared to OJ? Hm. Vivek is most definitely a ridiculous person, but the conservatives and the GOP has so many candidates for that title.