this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
124 points (94.3% liked)

politics

25383 readers
2543 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 92 points 2 years ago (1 children)

She said no, obviously; since this headline doesn't go that far.

I thought this was hilarious:

“I was expecting the corruption to be much more subtle,” Trent recalled. “This was basically a bag filled with cash.”

Honestly, I would've expected it, too. Especially with how rampant it is, you'd think that it would at least try to give the appearance of legitimacy.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 years ago

Yeah. Fuck that title.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Y'all don't deserve her, but you definitely need her. She will be Presidentress, just wait.

Nobody else except Cory Booker inspires me as much on the Dem side (Biden has shown growth and done some cool shit for sure tho)

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nobody else except Cory Booker inspires me as much on the Dem side

I will say Katie Porter seems pretty cool.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Im not super up to date with newer faces but I def expect there are several newer more progressive faces in play :)

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

President is a gender neutral word.

My DENTIST complained about being called MADAME President (the correct way to address a woman in the role of president) when she was elected as the president of her professional association. She didn't like the Madame even though it is proper and formal (she didn't like how a woman in charge of a brothel is called madam rather than a pimp).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

What did she want to be called, "President Lady?"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

Clearly "Pimp President"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

From how she was talking, I don't think she knew.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Mr. Dr. President, DDS.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yeah, like how is that any different from Mr or Monsieur President? I guess there's a slight connotation of My Lady kinda but it seems pretty picky.

Also, she would definitely not object to the playful title. Like how Schwarzenegger embraced being the Governator and everybody loves that title for him :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, like how is that any different from Mr or Monsieur President

Because I've never heard a single person say Mo sieur President....

I doubt she'd have complained about Mrs President when Mr President would have been used, but "President" is on its own most of the time

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

Anyway, people should call people what they say they want to be addressed as, I suppose. I actually want to revise my previous incredulity and suffice it to say that if she prefers a specific title, defer to her preference on the matter. Its a silly thing for people to get upset about and it could be a bit of a double standard to be concerned about this.

Its easier to ask permission than to have to redirect and ask for forgiveness in terms of what is proper and efficient and conducive to productive working relationships—hell, just relationships in general

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 years ago

I like her even more now.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago

Meaning other politicians accepted dirty money from these AIPAC trafficers.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Good luck with that. She has the most secure seat there is. You can go ahead and make a joke out of that, but it nonetheless will remain true.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago

/me takes bag with dollar sign on it like this is a fucking cartoon

also /me What money?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)