this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
334 points (97.7% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

7985 readers
754 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

When you're a few ounces short of a cup

Na mate, pretty good way to not fuck up some weed.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you're not a baker, yes.

But if you're working out a recipe for yourself, the flavors will be all wrong once you add the weed. That might make for an edible that is, well, inedible.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

I guess that inedible edibles will end up being eaten regardless.

Labrador

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

This feels overly pedantic. "Practicing edible recipes without the weed" is more specific than just baking. They are saying what they are baking and why. This is like someone saying "I'm frying some fish for dinner" and getting the response "so...cooking".

It also seems to imply that it's not baking anymore if you add the weed.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

This is exactly why I decided to never ride a two-wheeled bicycle and just get on a motorcycle! I didn't have the exact thing, so what's the point, right?

Edit: to be clear, my point here is that we shouldn't shit on people who want to practice a thing, particularly if some component of it is rare or expensive, before they have all of the things they need to make it happen. I imagine I took this too literally, but we should celebrate the people who try and practice and want to nail it when they can, particularly when one ingredient they may want may come at significant cost and/or rarity.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Shitting on it? It's just that "making edibles" without the active substance is... just cooking/baking.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I guess it's how you read the response. I took it as "you idiot, that's just baking" but I guess there are less awful interpretations.