Totally normal question to ask, regular poll choices
"yes - only child prostitute"
this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
108 points (100.0% liked)
the_dunk_tank
15994 readers
2 users here now
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
For ethical reasons 
b
as opposed to a child prostitute who has siblings
Should move to Argentina, heard they're abolishing the age of consent.
I'm really hoping this is just some very dark humor
They're reducing the election of a free market extremist in Argentina into "haha libertarians are pedos" jokes.
Indeed, the people most likely to be welcoming to them are market radicals and if your worldview revolves around "everything must be allowed", then legalizing that is likely to happen.
load more comments
(1 replies)
When I was in grad school, my advisor used to respond to any question that began "Imagine a possible world where.." by just stopping the questioner and saying *no, I'd rather not."
Imagine a world where you didn't have to listen to these stupid questions
Imagine the american president is 100 years old and dying of dementia. His last wish is one more genocide. Is it ethical for the Zionist Entity to do one?
if i ever hear someone say the phrase "free speech" again I'm dunking their head in the toilet
sneerclub had a moratorium on threads about her because she posts like this with fulltime dedication
Too unsubtle about what the rest of the "grey tribe" wants.
I regret googling that. Thank you.
RonPaulf the Grey
I wonder if he chuckled when he realized he could just shove Ron Paul in front of anything he wanted if he kept the last letter the same. Amazing wordplay.
The most euphoric STEMbros I've ever known insisted they were superior artists, poets, and writers to anyone in the humanities because the humanities taught nothing of importance that STEM couldn't produce with STEMlogic alone 
Look upon the works of STEMlogic, ye underwater basket weavers, and despair
An increasingly hingeless tech bro trying to apply the golden ratio to sentence structure and create the mathematically perfect novel.
The CEO of "Soylent" bragged about developing a perfect dating algorithm that would ensure he would get laid by choosing the correct things to say in offline "dialogue trees." 
I bet that dude thinks Persona is an accurate representation of how to make friends. Jfc
I've met people that actually fucking said that: that the Secular Calvinist Protestant Work Ethic, Animoo Edition shit pushed in some of those games was actually a basis for how to date and how to live life. You know, hustlegrinding their way to a harem that mysteriously doesn't seem to happen without hiring sex workers or going to magical rich people islands. 
What if the world was made of chocolate pudding
What if the pudding consents though
LSD and garden gnomes; not even once
The infinite potential of the human mind and these fools are trying so hard to find justifiable ways to engage in csa.
The fantastical Singularity(tm) of eternal life and godlike superpowers must maintain 1950s 
aesthetics, including the normalization of hurting children.
Suppose-
No.
Hypotheticals were a mistake.
:internet-delenda-est:
Get a capital-R "Rationalist" talking long enough and they will eventually talk about any conceivable scenario where they think it might be okay to harm children. 
load more comments
(1 replies)
Imagining the Make A Wish employee tasked with arranging this
The stress of having to find a new guy because the last one killed himself in prison must be immense
I don't even know what the worst option is...
There’s a hidden assumption that they’re properly orderable. They are clearly non-transitive.
That implies that we could use these options as an extremely cursed alternative to Rock Paper Scissors.
Stop posting Aella this is her whole thing
ecks more like yucks
Yudcks.
Argentinian congressional debates be like
Liberals justifying their ideology: Imagine this hypothetical situation that has not happened and, even if it does happen, will always remain a weird anecdotal outlying edgecase. In this situation, would you agree with me?
Leftists: Graphs
load more comments
(2 replies)
view more: next ›