this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
110 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13991 readers
692 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

specifically watched this happen with a funny-clown-hammer ite myself

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 years ago

Funny because one could say Trotskyists were the original Vaushites

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago (4 children)

While I don’t disagree, I don’t know how to square it with this instance’s purported non-sectarian stance.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

non-sectariasm on Hexbear is just anti-trot tbf

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago

I mean, even the Trots hate other Trots, so it's probably okay.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Cuz it's an obvious shitpost, yet if somehow someone feels called out by this then they are undoubtelly krakkkers and/or massive libs

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It’s a fair point, though I think this meme is going after a very specific type of person: present day neoconservatives that say they used to be Trotskyites.

I’ve never seen a Trot on this site. I’m probably the closest thing in that “I think Stalin did a lot of good but also a lot of bad, but obviously not anything close to what anti-communists claim. Ultimately he and the party were faced with a multitude of impossible problems and I don’t know if the choices I would have made in his shoes would have been any better”.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago

“I think Stalin did a lot of good but also a lot of bad, but obviously not anything close to what anti-communists claim. Ultimately he and the party were faced with a multitude of impossible problems and I don’t know if the choices I would have made in his shoes would have been any better”.

I don't think this is very far off what most ML's believe, that whole "Stalin did nothing wrong" thing is just an internet meme.

Also: Stalin did nothing wrong.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'd say the line goes between the second and the third guy (any imperialism is bad, so if Stalin ever did that, it would have been just as bad as that of the west)

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Far be it from me to defend Trots… but when I hear about these former “Trots” who became neocon ghouls… idk I can’t help but wonder if these people were just very nominally Trots. Cultural Trots, if you will (similar to the concept of a “Cultural Christian”). Like, one guy went to Marxist book clubs with his Trot girlfriend for a couple years so he identified with it for a bit. Or someone who had zero idea what Trotskyism is but thought the way someone explained it to him once made it seem cool. Just seems like a massive swing.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

As I understand it it's basically a combination of disillusionment and their material conditions. Trotskyism was a more palatable option for young people with leftist sympathies but too much Cold War conditioning and too little theoretical grounding to side with the Soviets against their own country, so as they grew older and richer, there was no perfect magical imperial core revolution coming along for them to tag along to, and they lost whatever principles they once had they took the framework they'd gotten from trot theory and reapplied it to the ends that a comfortable upper/upper middle class American would want, namely nationalist and imperialist goals.

Or to put it another way, if someone was sectarian against the USSR and their material interests were those of a comfortable white American beneficiary of empire, that's a whole lot of pressure to embrace American nationalism and go all in on the empire shit.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I refuse to believe this is anywhere near true irl and not just an online meme

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago

Oh it's very real, arch neo-cons like Irving Cristal started off as Trots

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago

Sometimes the socialist to neoliberal pipeline is generational pete

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Our trot comrades would never cross phase 2/3. If they do, countdown

Also 3 is quickly becoming untenable

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

3 is becoming untenable

It was never tenable

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Neither was 2. What is going on here?

1 is shaky at best.