this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
139 points (100.0% liked)

196

17918 readers
468 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

there's two common meanings for respect, with very different meanings.

  1. treat someone like an authority

  2. treat someone like a person

\

  1. is earned, 2. is a basic right.
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

Beautiful clarification, thank you.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Just to clarify: people don't have to be nice to you, but they don't get to be a dick.

Remember: neutrality is the way.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

@BartsBigBugBag what was the original? My brain is trying to fill in the gaps but keeps coming up with "Mutilated People".

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Likely marginalized people

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yeah, I thought the edit was giving me "All Lives Matter" vibes.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

yeah, especially the oppression part doesn't make any sense in this edit

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I’m not sure what the original said, to be honest. If you find it, I’d love to have it. If it is marginalized people, that would be better definitely. I think there was a whole discourse around these memes on og 196, but I only caught the back end of it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

I’d imagine so, I never actually saw the original so I can’t say.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Thanks @itslilith that makes sense!