this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
238 points (96.9% liked)

politics

24320 readers
2902 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump isn’t used to constraints.

The former president ignores and antagonizes anyone who tells him no. He built a business — and later political — brand as someone who says and does what he wants, largely without consequence. Even after losing the White House, Trump remains accustomed to deference, surrounded by people who greet him with nightly standing ovations at his clubs and cheer his most outrageous lies.

But Trump came face-to-face with a new reality Wednesday when he was called to the witness stand and fined $10,000 for violating a gag order prohibiting him from attacking court personnel in his New York civil fraud case. Trump denied he was referring to a senior law clerk when he told reporters in the courthouse hallway that someone “sitting alongside” Judge Arthur Engoron was “perhaps even much more partisan than he is.”

Engoron wasn’t having it.

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 138 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The $10,000 holds little financial consequence for a wealthy defendant who flew to his appearance aboard a private jet.

They must think we’re pretty stupid to phrase it like “the justice system is being tested”. The justice system crushes hundreds of people every single day and it doesn’t miss a beat.

Politically powerful white people being tested to follow the fucking law is the appropriate title.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They missed some stuff. During a trial regarding election fraud, he flew his jet TO AND FROM A CAMPAIGN RALLY.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The trial the article is about has nothing to do with election fraud.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago

The mental gymnastics.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"That's beginning to test the legal system"

...as it pertains to rich white men, at least

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 years ago

What a fucking joke.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That test happens all the time. And the justice system consistently fails it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

The justice system is working as designed, when the designers are an oligarchy.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I have an idea what restraints might work. They’re two steel circles with hinges, connected to each other with a short chain.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Hey, let's leave that night with Stormy Daniels out of this....

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Shibari rope could also work. Probably not as relevant, though, just throwing it out there.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It would have taken zero effort to not type this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It would've also been less effort to not ask AI to visualize it (Mildly NSFW!).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Moments like these make me wish I didn't have an imagination.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Have they tried jailing him till trial? That works 99% of the time.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

And with 99% of people.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

And so far, the legal system is losing by a country mile.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


But Trump came face-to-face with a new reality Wednesday when he was called to the witness stand and fined $10,000 for violating a gag order prohibiting him from attacking court personnel in his New York civil fraud case.

But the courtroom drama previews the tensions mounting between Trump’s competing legal and political interests as he vies for the Republican presidential nomination while facing a litany of criminal and civil cases.

And it underscores how efforts to hold Trump accountable are testing the legal system in unprecedented ways as judges struggle with how to rein in the former president’s inflammatory rhetoric while balancing the free speech rights of a political candidate.

But Trump has turned the camera-lined hallway outside the courtroom into his own personal campaign stage, holding impromptu press conferences multiple times a day as he enters and exits the room.

In 2017, a federal judge in Brooklyn revoked the bail of pharmaceutical company CEO Martin Shkreli, who had been convicted of fraud, and sent him to jail after he went on social media and offered a $5,000 bounty to anyone who could get him a strand of Democrat Hillary Clinton’s hair.

Prosecutors asked late Wednesday for the gag order to be reinstated, citing recent social media posts about Trump’s former chief of staff that they said represented an attempt to influence and intimidate him.


The original article contains 1,415 words, the summary contains 225 words. Saved 84%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!