this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
27 points (100.0% liked)

Space

7980 readers
26 users here now

News and findings about our cosmos.


Subcommunity of Science


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's really not all that much considering the federal budget.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

Military spending is over a trillion, right? They could fund this with a rounding error.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

Of course it costs an astronomical amount of money! It's a space mission, what else would it cost?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How much do we spend killing innocent people abroad every year? We can bring back some fucking rocks thanks

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure that if we, as a specie, stopped wasting money to kill each other, we could give food, shelter, healthcare and education to each of us.

And there would still be enough money left to found this kind of scientific projetcs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Absolutely. But there's always the risk that that one entity doesn't switch gears and then they have the strongest military and can fuck everybody up always.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

My abstract for the linked article


NASA's Perseverance rover has been collecting valuable rock samples from Mars' Jezero Crater to search for signs of ancient life. An independent report found that NASA's plan to return these samples to Earth by the late 2020s at a cost of $4 billion is unworkable, and will actually cost between $8-11 billion. While returning the first samples from Mars is scientifically important, the project's budget has increased as engineers have refined complex mission designs. There are also competing priorities for funding within NASA's $3.2 billion planetary science budget. The report recommends delaying launches originally planned for 2027-2028, and developing an alternative strategy. If launched by 2030, the revised mission could still cost $8-9.6 billion.

NASA will now reassess plans to determine how to accomplish the strategically and scientifically important goal of returning the first Martian rocks to Earth for detailed study.


This comment was generated by a bot. Send comments and complaints via private message.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Put up a damn Aldrin Cycler already.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Have they considered USPS flat rate shipping?