this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
79 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

565 readers
458 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/El Chisme

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

This was published back in 2020 and it is truly one of the most cringe things I've ever read. Some highlights:


But either way, let’s have a look at why Tankies don’t matter, and yet in a way, they really do!

(Did that sound confusing? That’s right, it’s all about the ‘dialectic!’ The endless rub and grind of opposites! REEEEEE!) 😛


Nowadays, however, the term ‘Tankie’ is used for a general ‘woke’ or superficial, virtue-signalling kind of ‘progressive’ politics and rhetoric, where any level of brutality in Pyongyang, Tehran or Peking is taken to be less of a morally substantive consideration than the fact such governments are against the UK, the USA, the EU, Israel, or any other supposedly ‘root of all evil’ kind of country.


Arguing with Tankies is like arguing with Holocaust deniers (in some cases, of course, the term can overlap; depending on how shameless their antisemitism and antizionism is).

The authoritarian left’s fascination with dictatorial ideologies and regimes can be founded on naivete, or it can be founded on self-consciously cynical opportunism.

The one thing it is never founded upon, however, is a healthy synthesis of good faith and moral and logical consistency.

This means that at least 99% of the time, if not always, reasoning with Tankies is utterly futile.


What’s all this we hear about religion being the opium of the people?

Not any more!

Tehran are just misunderstood…

Er, what?!

Ironically, guess who one of the biggest killers of Marxists (as distinguished from Marxist killers!) in 20th century Iran was?


You don’t have to be a Marxist to win the approval of Tankies.

After all, they’re a bit more ‘tolerant’ and ‘inclusive’ towards other kinds of totalitarian regimes than they used to be, before the age of the internet!


At the very end of the article is a youtube embed for Guns N' Roses' song Chinese Democracy. This is the most deeply unserious article ever.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Ironically, guess who one of the biggest killers of Marxists .. in 20th century Iran was?

I mean, in a >90% Muslim country, I'm going to assume they were.. a muslim? Quélle surprise.

Of course, globally speaking, far and away the biggest killer of Communists in the 19th century was an officially Christian Nazi Germany.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

And second place, Christian Nazi America.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 day ago

It was the tankies that stopped the Holocaust

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Lmao not a single "tankie" I know would ever veer into holocaust denialism

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago

You’re denying their right to commit a holocaust against the Palestinian people

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

I have seen libs unironically claim that Holocaust denial was state policy in the USSR.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Nah, saying that what zionists are doing to Palestinians is like what nazis were doing to Jews is considered holocaust denying to these people.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you judge "tankies" by our enemies, we come out looking pretty good.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hence, BadEmpanada's point

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm afraid I'm not familiar with this.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago

Lol I can't listen to him in a livestream-style-video for more than like 30 seconds but that "ooh, I can't imagine a better compliment than that" about zionist hate was hilarious. I also love when Zionists dislike me

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago

Nowadays, however, the term ‘Tankie’ is used for a general ‘woke’ or superficial, virtue-signalling kind of ‘progressive’ politics and rhetoric

they just straight up admit its the "woke" of punching left

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

It appears that we are both weak and strong.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

smug fucking assholes this is like if buzzfeed endorsed george wallace in 1968

also lmfao at invoking GNR’s Chinese Democracy in any context other than the album taking forever to make and disappointing all the fans who were left to listen to it

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

matt-jokerfied

I dont even know what the point of the article was, and why did he include a straight up nazi tweet from Richard spencer as an example of Tankie rhetoric????

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Getting ever closer to fox news complaining about the tankies on hexbear

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago

Alright, who taught them the word this time?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh my fucking god that article is pure jagoff

It's worse than the most smug redditor shit. I only made it as far as the third paragraph before I wanted to gouge my eyes out with a fucking spoon.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In the dizzying birl and buzz of the age of the internet, nobody can be blamed for not being entirely au fait with the latest online slang.

:kelly: (latest fad)

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

use tanks

use of tanks is derogatory

pottery

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's the year 2100, all our coastal cities are flooded, yet we're still complaining about a decision of ~~Stalin's~~ Khrushchev from 1956.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It wasn't even Stalin, it was fucking Khrushchev 😭😭

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Lol sorry. I just speed read this article.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

this person absolutely busted out a thesaurus to sound smart but i must thank them for teaching me "birl" : literally to spin or cause to spin, but used in a sentence more to to mean 'having a good time'. from webster:

spent a good part of his time in Edinburgh birling into the wee small hours of the night.

i dunno if it will ever be useful but i'll see if i can work it into the ol lexicon

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's just Brits mispronouncing "whirl" I think.

Or this is how real (read: not that posh queen-talk) Brits say it. Idk, but I agree that it's a fun one

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Cute 😍😍😍 i want a tankie!!