this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
755 points (93.7% liked)

Memes

51434 readers
1027 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

The Roman Empire split in 395 AD. The Western Roman Empire, including the city of Rome itself, fell in 476 AD.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

in b4 someone says that it is an "average".

that number is made up BS anyways

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Forget about averages, his post isn't even factually correct. Rome did not last 1,480 years.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

depends how you define Rome, from 753bc and the Byzantine empire lasted all the way to 1453CE. so Rome lasted longer if you count it as the Roman empire.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Roman Empire began in 27 BC with Augustus, the first emperor of Rome. It eventually split in half in 395 AD. The Western Roman Empire, including the city of Rome itself, fell in 476 AD. The Eastern Roman Empire, or the Byzantine Empire was centered on Constantinople, not Rome.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yhea, but they still considered themselves Roman.

the point is that it is impossible to determine when exactly an empire begun or ended.

we could argue for weeks and the Roman empire, and that's just one of countless empires.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The point is Rome did not last 1,480+ years as you and the other poster claimed, not even close. Odoacer conquered Rome and became the first barbarian king of Italy in 476 AD.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

tell that to the byzantines who claimed to be the successors of the Roman empire. don't think they got the memo

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago (13 children)

Uh, yeah, not like this.

If you're sitting around waiting for the empire to fall, then it's never going to fall. Empires fall because people make them fall.

And it's going to be achieved with blood...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

Also, ask when Rome fell, historians wont agree on any specific date. They were never the top of the town afterwards, but the fall was more of a gradual multi-century tumble punctuated by hitting every rock on the way down.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A watched empire never falls.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 156 points 3 days ago (21 children)

The 250 year thing is basically completely made up BS

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

Indeed. The empire you left to make your own with blackjack and hookers was nearly double that. If you want to be facetious too, then probably triple.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] brygphilomena 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Mean, mode, or median?

What's the standard deviation look like?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 81 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (7 children)

I hate to be nitpicky about a meme but I love to be nitpicky. This claims is based on bullshit statistics that the author made up or bent to his will. The Ottoman empire alone shows this to be incorrect but Rome too stands out. Besides, what would an arbitrary amount of time have to do with the collapse of complex economic systems. Its bullshit idealism and I hate seeing it.

I am begging the US to collapse though

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

Of course this is incorrect, go look up an empire and see.

... Roman empire got over 1000 years, Ottoman's got 623 years, Mongol empire only got 162.

...and Italy, Turkey, and Mongolia are still around, they're just not empires anymore. They're Nations.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (7 children)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Even if this statistic wasn't bullshit, this comic has an inherent cruelty to it that ironically feels very American

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

Empires don't end, they fizzle out.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (5 children)

When someone says "death to America", they aren't saying "death to Americans". A government/state is a regime, not all it's people, despite how much as nationalists love to stoke that sort of patriotism. So I have no problem with the slogan, I call for the fall of the US imperialist regime.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_to_America#Interpretation_and_meaning - has some confirmations from various Iranian politicians and a travel writer.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

Usians: "hate the government not the people"

Usians when hearing someone else say "hate the government not the people" about USA: "we're gonna kill you"

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago

It's not correct, but would be nice.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Facebook type posting

load more comments
view more: next ›