this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
37 points (93.0% liked)

Games

19933 readers
522 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The regulatory bodies of several nations really dropped the ball by allowing the Zenimax and Activision-Blizzard acquisitions.

This isn't the result of a market being "overextended", and it isn't about finding efficiencies. It's about Microsoft doing what it's always done- Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They should extinguish Bethesda then so the people there maybe get to work on something good again.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

So they can go work for EA? Or Ubisoft? Or one of Take-Two's dev teams? Or something owned by Tencent or Embracer or Epic?

This isn't just "Microsoft bad". It's "Microsoft is one of many giant mega corporations that are ruining the entire industry".

Maybe some of these people could join or found smaller indie studios, but there are reasons why they didn't do that already.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

I was being sassy. It‘s a harsh business where people are getting exploited and being held in precarious situations for wanting to work their dream job.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Microsoft still has a good reputation?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

MS reputation when it comes to gaming ain’t that bad. They scored some wins over the last two years with lots of decent titles available day 1 on GamePass while Sony is stuck doing remaster after remaster. Nintendo isn’t doing all that hot either reputation-wise. So maybe not great but the bar is set low.

Honestly it’s freaking weird how bad XSX is doing compared to PS5 - both are about the same performance-wise unlike previous generation, games are cheaper thanks to GP and there’s such an overabundance of games that lack of exclusives doesn’t hurt that much. I guess that’s just inertia from previous gen but even then Xbox is a budget conscious pick so you’d imagine they’d sell better.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Nintendo isn’t doing all that hot either reputation-wise.

Outside of Lemmy and certain circles, it certainly feels that Nintendo is doing fine. I can't say for sure but anecdotally I've hardly seen ant criticism of Nintendo whereas Sony and Microsoft get quite a lot of it. I know that may not really count for much but it's hard to get a proper gauge of these things.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 hours ago

Nintendo gets plenty criticism and rightly so and what we traditionally consider to be gamers opt to use other systems. The thing about Nintendo is that their main customer base aren’t gamers but kids. For now I wouldn’t look too much into sales figures of Switch 2, it’s mostly a measure of huge stock available at launch.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

They are constantly yo-yoing over making games or just providing cloud services, they’ve closed the only studio that made them a highly rated exclusive in recent years, released all decent exclusives to competitors, stopped the backwards compatibility program, increased GP pricing, stopped making physical games, haven’t done anything with any popular ip they’ve bought since early 2000s, pioneered paid multiplayer and ads on the dashboard, and I have a lot more complaints. And I’ve had both xbox one and series x, and they were fine as game systems, but I’m not getting the next thing they make.

Sony hasn’t been that much better, but at least they are actually making games, and these games are well made, even if we saw fewer releases this gen.

Steam Deck is the only sustainable option it seems, considering where the industry is these days.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

That’s kind of unfair assessment for Microsoft. There’s been more well rated games than HiFi Rush (even if closing Tango is a travesty). We should be applauding that they no longer lock their games to a single platform (despite fanboys crying over it). GP pricing increased but it’s still great value for the money and the best deal around. Their main franchises get new entries consistently and there’s been new IP too in the meantime (Indiana Jones is a joy). I think they ran out of publishers that wanted to participate in backwards compatibility program but I’d be surprised if ActiBlizz catalogue won’t join it sooner or later.

Honestly, what are the titles that Sony released in the past 5 years that aren’t sequels or remakes? I’m super confused how Sony is getting away with this.

As to Valve. Why is Microsoft stopping physical sales bad but it’s ok when Valve does it? Valve killed physical sales for the entire platform.Once they got a monopoly sales with deep discounts ended. Can you really trust Valve with backwards compatibility and long term support over Microsoft? One has a history of abandoning stuff when they no longer find it profitable, the other is probably best in class still. When I moved from PS4 to XSX it was because I could sell my physical copies, something not possible on PC. End goal for Valve seems to be Android for games where they exert power over some Linux based platform with their app store - that’s no good for any of us. And that’s without addressing elephant in the room that Valve is no different if not worse than EA when it comes to gambling.

I don’t have favourites and use what I think is best for me at a given time. I’m deeply confused with what other gamers are choosing for themselves.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Its crazy to me that even after all these years, gaming media is still using Xbox/Microsoft as a punching bag. I guarantee that this opinion piece wouldnt have been written if Nintendo or Sony were doing the same levels of layoffs. Instead just a few softball articles would be made before going back to the regular clickbait slop basically all of the media giants create.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago

if Nintendo or Sony were doing the same levels of layoffs

But they're not. Well, Sony did layoff 900 people last year and took deserved flak for it. But you're right, it's not even close to the level of Microsoft the last 2 years.

https://www.ign.com/articles/sony-announces-significant-playstation-layoffs-affecting-900-staff-london-studio-to-close

https://www.wionews.com/technology/microsofts-xbox-division-set-for-layoffs-amid-major-restructuring-plans-1750931957018

As for Nintendo,

“If we reduce the number of employees for better short-term financial results, employee morale will decrease. I sincerely doubt employees who fear that they may be laid off will be able to develop software titles that could impress people around the world.”

https://www.nme.com/news/gaming-news/nintendo-ceos-refusal-to-lay-off-staff-goes-viral-following-industry-wide-cuts-3577675