this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
49 points (98.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6945 readers
474 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

If the risk of a plane crashing was as high as the risk of the AMOC collapsing, none of us would ever fly because they would not let the plane take off. And the idea that our little spaceship, our planet, is under the risk of essentially crashing and we’re still continuing business as usual is mindblowing. I think part of the problem is that people feel distant from the dangers and don’t realise the children we have in our homes today are threatened with a chaotic, disastrous, unliveable future. Talking about the risks of catastrophe is a very useful way to overcome this kind of false distance.

https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/amoc.html

^ A basic explainer on the AMOC from the now functionally extinct National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Also a note on the article

It depends. I talk about three different kinds of doomerism. One is the despair that arises from misunderstanding the science and thinking we’re absolutely on the path to collapse within 20 or 30 years, no matter what we do. That is not true.

Citation Needed

There is a difference between nihilism and truth, and the truth is it is far too late AND we are now accelerating towards the thing we were previously braking to avoid. I am done with empty centrist optimism, get your affairs in order, probably don't have kids, and be real about how many years you have left with a reasonable quality of life because no matter your age it isn't a lot.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Your last paragraph hits really close to home. Nomad Century by Gaia Vince might be worth reading to you.