Not the worst idea!
Spaceflight
Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.
All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).
Other related space communities:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
Related meme community:
Licensing fees could make sense if they help the FAA staff up and speed up. I don't see how the payload mass plays into that goal. They must have some other motivations. It could just be "heavy payloads can afford a more expensive license", which isn't inherently true in the era of cheap mass to orbit.
That fee per pound of payload also doesn't preclude crazy edge cases like Starship bidding to launch the TROPICS cube sats.
I don’t see how the payload mass plays into that goal.
I wonder if that could be a way to provide a lower barrier to entry for newer launch startups which typically have smaller rockets. Folks like RocketLab, Firefly, and Stoke. Though I think a cadence-based metric (everyone gets 5 free launches per year) might be a better system for that.
Based on who wrote it, my guess is more that it's an easy way to tax bigger companies that can afford it, not a way to be nice to startups / small launch.