So I guess the question is: Did they need a warrant? Who's property is that? IMO it's property of the legislative branch, so the executive should have a warrant. Not sure what the law says though.
this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
45 points (95.9% liked)
New York Times gift articles
981 readers
190 users here now
Share your New York Times gift articles links here.
Rules:
- Only post New York Times gift article links.
Info:
- The NYT Open Team. (2021-06-23). “A New Way to Share New York Times Stories”. open.nytimes.com.
- “Gift Articles for New York Times Subscribers”. (n.d.). help.nytimes.com.
Tip:
- Google "unlocked_article_code" and limit search results to the past week.
- Mastodon: Use control-F or ⌘-F to search this page. (ref)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Ownership might be complicated. Its a legislative office that's leased from a courthouse.
They surely needed a warrant since they were not in hot pursuit of a criminal; hence the need to fabricate a story about rioters.
This story is such fascist bullshit to read.
Germany in the 1940s “Open up! You’re harboring Jews!”
America in 2025, “Open up! You’re harboring political enemies!”
These people expedite the erosion of law. When federal agents don’t follow the law & the injustice is obvious, it’ll turn into anarchy, which is followed by a ‘justified’ police state / Marshall law. We’re no better than our enemies. We used to care about the optics, but now even that is dropped.
So disappointed by this country.
Sir, this is the gift articles community.
No worries. Here on, I'll just read the archived version and leave others to accept nyt 3rd party cookies or not.