this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
102 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13940 readers
594 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EstraDoll@hexbear.net 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

finally, a solution approved of by Jupiter Optimus Maximus

[–] KnownUnknownKnower@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

With a name like that he’s gotta be correct

[–] dannoffs@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago

I'd never disagree with someone who's name sounds like the top trim level of a minivan.

[–] Speaker@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago

If Palestina prima is so good, why don't they make a—

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How did old places divided up into territories with vague borders tax border towns?

Were some of them taxed twice by both regions claiming them as part of their territory?

[–] huf@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

if the two regions were antagonistic, yes, probably. double taxation is one of the reasons you dont want to live in border zones.

i know this shit contributed to central hungary emptying when it was a warzone between the ottomans and austrians.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

That's really interesting. Makes sense.

[–] CliffordBigRedDog@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago

3 Palestines might be abit much but at least its all Palestine

[–] csverdad@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

¿Tres Palestinas, en este economia?