this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
-1 points (48.5% liked)

Programming

21182 readers
147 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Oh wow.

That looks like an overly complicated solution to a problem that doesn't exist. Synching stuff that is in git? Why not just use.... git? Also npm.... and the example has an env var named "DB_PASS" in it. You never put passwords in version control.

[–] dragonfly4933 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It is generally considered a bad idea to use envs for passing secrets since envs for process n are available to other processes which have access and permission.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Exactly, you never check passwords into version control. So what happens when you need to share those values with other team members? The github example is not to put a .env file into a repo but to add the secrets to github’s native secret manager, which is what products like actions use to read envs.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Environment variable abuse

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Waiting for the leak announcements

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The best way to manage environment variables: don't use environment variables.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What do you do instead for dynamic values that are needed at runtime and inappropriate to check in to version control?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

I'd rather prefer CI-level variables (macros?) that are not exported to the environment. Unfortunately, most CI developers don't care about security.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Nah, just use direnv instead, comrade.