this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
17 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

6448 readers
13 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Today we are announcing a new privacy feature coming to Kagi Search. Privacy Pass is an authentication protocol first introduced by Davidson and recently standardized by the IETF as RFCs. At the same time, we are announcing the immediate availability of Kagi’s Tor onion service.

In general terms, Privacy Pass allows “Clients” (generally users) to authenticate to “Servers” (like Kagi) in such a way that while the Server can verify that the connecting Client has the right to access its services, it cannot determine which of its rightful Clients is actually connecting. This is particularly useful in the context of a privacy-respecting paid search engine, where the Server wants to ensure that the Client can access the services, and the Client seeks strong guarantees that, for example, the searches are not associated with them.

[etc...]

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well this is legit. I recently cancelled my kagi subscription for privacy reasons. This might make me reconsider. Is anyone here with access willing to test it out and report back?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I have it; it works (even in private browsing windows so long as you visit the site logged in, in a non-private browsing window first).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Awesome. Also be sure to use a vpn and and extension to randomize your browser fingerprint!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

The extension itself is open source and per them (I haven't verified on my own) actually takes steps to combat the browser fingerprint problem; so I think it's really just the VPN side of things that most people need to worry about (at least from the perspective of disassociating their search history and the sites they visit).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What is wrong with that comment? Also he is not an engineer, so hopefully he simply didn't touch the implementation, nor design it, since they had to implement a public standard (although new).

They also opensourced their implementation, maybe you can go and review it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Tbh, I understood that just as a way to explain the difference between knowing who you are and what you do. I don't think there was any explicit parallel between company and family. In fact in general I would say the message is pretty clear, they are them and customers are customers.

(BTW, to be picky, neither is privacy. Privacy is not lack of information, privacy is information only accessed by authorized parties. A service that collects data and uses it only for the purpose you agree with (not formally in the sense of 300 pages, really) is still private.)

The rest is very opinable stuff, you do you.

Edit: BTW asking why a feature is important is not paternalistic, and it is done on basically every post there. And why wouldn't it be? If they need to decide to invest their limited resources they should know why customers want something, people ask all kind of stuff.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I read that blog some time ago, and I disagree with a lot of it. Either way, I find kagi to be very transparent, and to be honest they "telling you" in non-legal conversation means nothing (I.e. Vlad answering "we use X, Y, Z"). This is why I care about facts and about legal documents. The privacy policy is what they will be held accountable for and that is what I take as a reference, for example.

Similarly I agree about this feature. This is just a way to walk the walk, and to be really on the forefront on privacy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

deleted by creator

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

I mean his phrasing could have been better but he is right that privacy and anonymity are different.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Honestly we need something like the Taler payment system

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

I'm not sure if you do given the account being disassociated from the search... Your bank could know you pay for Kagi, but that doesn't mean anyone knows what you search.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

One question ? Do we have an OpenSource community on Lemmy.World ?