I think this article neglects how few people it takes riding the bus to make a bus line worth it. It doesn't even require massive technological strides or innovation. It just takes purchasing buses and maintenance facilities, and hiring mechanics and drivers. I know that's a big upfront cost, but it pays off so fast. Even my small rural county in West Virginia, United States, has a bus system that sees high usage. I don't know for sure that Australia has the same resistance to buses as we do here, but I have my suspicions based on the article discussing how many single user vehicle users are causing issues. And I also understand that for rural Australia, that doesn't address the problem, but it still seems worth a mention
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
Currently, a large diesel SUV typically emits a kilogram of CO₂ for every 3 kilometres of driving, compared to 15km for a light electric vehicle and 200 kilometres for an e-bike. An average electric vehicle currently emits 1kg of CO₂ every 7km.
Key takeaway I think. Vehicules that weight more than you, use energy to move themselves more than they use it to move you. It gets worse the heavier the vehicule is.
Cars are not the way forward to reach net zero emissions. You need to build an actual transport system, not re-model the one we currently have that is very much car-centric.