this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
293 points (95.9% liked)

World News

48436 readers
1803 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 148 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The painting is protected by glass, so no damage was done to the painting.

I read through way too many articles that failed to mention this important detail.

http://bbc.com/news/articles/cydd9ye77rmo

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It wouldn’t be a big loss. That painting is ugly as hell.

[–] [email protected] 76 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think it's a terrific representation of the horrifically bloody history of the British Monarchy

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I don't think it was meant to be pretty lol

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I know the artist said some other bullshit to justify this choice, but to me it just looks like the blood their wealth was built on.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I like it because it's hella odd as shit. King, embrace the fuck-my-shit-up results of this glorious piece.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can't stop thinking about how someone got paid to make this painting.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He's pretty famous for making portraits. Here's his portrait of Idris Elba.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

See, that isn’t ugly.

Which makes me think it was on purpose. Which makes me hate it a little less.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

He has a lot of upper class clients who he paints just as ... starkly as the king's portrait.

It is very much on purpose.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

Now that is a gorgeous balance of color and brush strokes. So why did the artist choose that awful color theme for Charles?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Right? Spit right in the royal families face and they pay you for the privilege. Priceless and hilarious

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Same shit that happens with every climate protest. "Climate protestors deface painting" etc.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It's much less engaging this way.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't anger Count Vigo of Carpathia like that. Remember what happened the last time?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

He got turned into Wallace. The titular character.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

You really have to hand it to the British. They're great at stuff like this.

Nice bit of Wensleydale with a protest, eh?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

Improved it tbh.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

turned into wallace and gromit

so where's the change?

[–] Leate_Wonceslace 2 points 1 year ago

He's smarter and less evil now.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

"Fancy some cheese?"

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Oh no! Some rich person's pretty garbage was ridiculed!?

Heck off. I have real problems.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Now THIS is pod racing!!!!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It still looks like him, except happier.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I remember when you could go to an art museum and see pictures and sculptures of stuff. That was kinda nice.