this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
170 points (97.2% liked)

Ukraine

10248 readers
582 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

Matrix Space


Community Rules

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³ Defense Aid πŸ’₯


πŸ’³ Humanitarian Aid βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ


πŸͺ– Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


See also:

[email protected]

!combatvideos@SJW


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Better translation (still machine generated):


Enemy equipment is burning. More specifically, the large anti-submarine ship "Admiral Levchenko" in the Barents Sea. The fight for survivability continues, but we hope it's in vain.

This is what happens when the "superpower" receives sanctions from Ukraine and cannot service the engines produced in Mykolaiv on their own. Ten years were not enough to solve this problem. One of the installations caught fire.

Great training, guys, keep it up.

Just so you understand, there are a few hundred crew members there. Not the "Moskva," of course, but still not bad.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On top of that, it might include two helicopters :
Aircraft carried : 2 x Ka-27 'Helix' series helicopters
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_destroyer_Admiral_Levchenko

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If it's just a fire that might sink the ship, wouldn't the first course of action be to vacate all aircraft?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, the first course of action would be to stop the fire.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I guess that depends on how big it is and what access is like around it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

In that political and economic situation? Naw, you first find someone else to blame.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

So this is a Ukrainian built Russian ship that just on its own decided to join the fight on the Ukrainian side by self-immolation

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well now I have a new favourite type of warship: "large anti-boat ship"

It is magnificent.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

That is pretty much the definition of a destroyer, to be fair.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Sound suicidal and apparently very effective at its job

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Oooh, I didn’t realize the Northern Fleet was scheduled to commission another water-permeable submarine! I hope the fish enjoy it :)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh no! Anyway.. The Dacia Sandero!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

The second best navy in Ukraine, probably the 7th best navy in the Barents lol

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Dropping like flies

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do they even have an anti-submarine ship in this fight? Does Ukraine have any subs?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This ship was in the seas north of Norway and Russia

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't think Ukraine was operating that far from home

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Reading the translation it just seems like the ship can’t be maintained anymore since it was built in Ukraine.