I don't think many anti-natalists want to outlaw procreation, with them being against arbitrariness and all.
this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
20 points (100.0% liked)
games
21021 readers
106 users here now
Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.
Rules
- No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, or transphobia. Don't care if it's ironic don't post comments or content like that here.
- Mark spoilers
- No bad mouthing sonic games here :no-copyright:
- No gamers allowed :soviet-huff:
- No squabbling or petty arguments here. Remember to disengage and respect others choice to do so when an argument gets too much
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
On one hand it's nihilistic Malthusian eco fash shit, on the other hand it is very 
Eh. This one isn't Malthusian. There's a case to be made that creating people is immoral and/or unethical. It's eco-fash if you're doing it because "Humanity is the virus!" and we need to save Gaia by not having babies so there's no more humans. It's Malthusian if you say "Oh well we're over carrying capacity so some people 
need to stop having babies. This is maybe third, secret thing where they've presumably decided that the moral case against making new people has merits and should be corrosively enforced. it might not be nihilistic, either, because it's premised on a moral value. Or, well, I guess it could still be nihilistic depending on how they conceptualize their morality, idk.