this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
148 points (96.2% liked)

Games

40002 readers
1735 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What's healthy for the business long term isn't healthy for the customer. Remember that.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nor the employees, only the capitalist benefits

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Right, because a healthy business consists of a sort of zombie corpse leech, not a symbiosis.

The little diner down the street where everyone has a good time every day? That’s not a healthy business.

It is very important that we twist the definition of every word to ensure people understand how bad capitalism is. Language and the ability to think is secondary to the great Revolution Take 25!

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I really hope these developers create new independent studios and if they ever get offered a big bag of money, they will remember what happened last time. Maybe they will be smart enough to create worker owned studios and not waste huge salaries on useless CEOs.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I won't bet on that, neither for nor against.

Look at the guy that created Minecraft. He was passionate about his work, had a company that was doing great and with prospect of future growth.

One thousand millions later and the guy checks out a boat load of money and sell off the company: he already had his.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was also his one game. Youd do the same if you were done with it and offered more money than you could spend in your life.

That's a very different scenario than a studio having released multiple games over a couple decades being bought out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't know if I would. Never had such an offer, never will.

I'm not very invested in the game/game studio culture but boiled down it gets to either a private owner or a board of directors deciding if it is the right moment to cash out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Right. So not the same situation as the Minecraft guy at all.

It's apples and oranges. You just took a name you heard and tried to shove into the wrong context.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't agree with you.

The major share holder of a game studio, with a major success on its portfolio, already working on other projects, decided he wanted to move away from it as the day to day work had become too demanding and made his part of the studio available for purchase, in fact cashing out on a very large sum of money.

I really can't see where that is "apples to oranges", concerning the current debate on studios being bought out and shut down on the turn of a dime.

Are game studios some separate entity that exist exempt of the at work business logic or human nature? Studios are companies created to generate profit for its founders, that will most likely take the opportunity to cash out when presented.

By contrast, independent authors/creators are becoming a growing force to be respected - which is very good - but will such authors be immune to selling their work for a high offer their work if such opportunity presents itself? Hopefully, they will, but I won't bet on it, neither for nor against.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The Minecraft guy was an independent author.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yup, that’s what qyron is presupposing with his argument. Read it again if you misunderstood.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If I ever run a successful company, I am never taking it public, and I hope that I will never accept a sum of money that more than doubles our assets.

I’ve worked in the startup world and seen too many companies fail in all but name when they receive investment money. It really sucks the soul out of a company.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I wish more people would create worker owned cooperatives. They might be more resilient and might even be more productive. Of cause the downside is that they don’t make one person very rich.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8206912/

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247750384_Cooperatives_Worker-Owned_Enterprises_Productivity_and_the_International_Labor_Organization

[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They want to ensure their business is working well, so they shutdown the parts that were working well, and left those that are failing miserably. Logic checks out

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

they got the IP, that's all they wanted.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't forget removing competitors! Gotta remove those competitors. That's what healthy businesses do. /s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can't you buy the rights to an IP without the attached studio ?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

You can try, but people won't be as thrilled for TES or Fallout without Bethesda, for example.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I would be.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I can understand that, yea. But I know I would be! It's high time something changes in that regard

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

FO5 is going to be a FO76 tier disaster. With the show there has to be a ton of pressure to crank something out the door. Microsoft’s folks are probably beating down Todd’s door. Bethesda has never really understood the series anyways.

If TES6 comes out, it’ll have 3 skills and ignore all established lore to turn an interesting and nuanced character into Bad Guy who wants to destroy the world for no reason. Admittedly normies really like this version of the series, so maybe it’ll still be wildly successful.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Limp dick anti trust agencies approved this shit...

Like wtf am I paying taxes for here? So rich people get more of my surplus labour?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She mispelled "investors will be happy next earning call"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Well, it literally says "business will be healthy" so yes that's what that means

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago

You see, our stock price goes up when we buy other companies and it goes up when we fire people. We're doing both at the same time, so our stock price will go up double. This is a sustainable business model and not at all a very dead canary in a very deadly coal mine.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

'"You know, we're a platform where you can play Grand Theft Auto but you can also play Palworld. Where you can play Call of Duty and can also play Pentiment. That doesn't change," she said.' - yeah but now I can't play HiFi Rush 2 :(

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You will when Micropenis puts out the sequel full of AI gen slop.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

Funny how they praise success these studios achieved before suddenly slamming the door shut and firing those people, but 343 has literally been fucking the corpse of Halo for 12 years now and you still funnel then millions of dollars to keep ruining everything.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

You know what would be even better for the long term? A large variety of games with less bullshit. Suck it, Microsoft.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Microsoft doesn't need those studios, just the IPs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They could sell the studio without the IPs, bring in some revenue, but it's worth more to kill the studio than let it exist to compete.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

I'm sure the studio employees feel the same way

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Yes, the modern mindset. Murder the product, preserve the manager's paygap.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who's taking bets on when they'll buy the next studio?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

After the fight they had to put up for Activision, it will likely be a while.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

We got one for not in a while.
Who's got anything sooner in mind?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Activision wasn't just a studio, it was a huge publisher with several studios, that's why they needed approval from competition regulators. I doubt they will stop buying studios over this in the short-term.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Can’t have a healthy business without insane overcompensation of the c-suite and friends

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah this is bullshit. They wanted the IP's and nothing more. Situations like this remind me of something that Marty O'Donnell said when that Bungie/Activision lawsuit happened. He said something along the lines of they have to own their IP's because it's the one thing a studio has that's holds value.