this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
22 points (95.8% liked)

chapotraphouse

13914 readers
724 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Anyone else keeping up with this?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

lib doc about a performative (conservative) lib outburst is being suppressed by libs

shrug-outta-hecks

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not a liberal doc.

And I was near where it happened. These people tried to do a fascist putsch.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dont doubt that they honestly believed they were going to overthrow the government. But what do you think their chances for success ever were?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Pretty darn likely. They had backing from several sectors of capital, but it was ersatz and done at the last minute.

This was obviously a test-run

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Pretty darn likely? What happens when the National Guard comes and mows them down? You think if they got into the building and hanged Mike Pence that they would have control over the country and everyone would have to bow down to them?

Why would they use idiots who try to climb a wall with a set of stairs inches away from them to launch a serious coup to take over the country?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Half of them smeared their own shit all over the interior walls. Even if by some miracle every person in Congress burst into flames and died on Jan 6, do you think corporations would start taking orders from them?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Nope.

I saw people armed to the teeth shouting about how they were going to topple the government.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They were larping. If they actually believed they could violently overthrow the government, they would have used those guns. But they didn't.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They weren't larping. They killed and injured several people.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They killed nobody but themselves, two rioters dying from heart attacks and one from a drug overdose. Oh and there was the woman killed by Capitol Police.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is PatSoc shit.

Ony PatSocs support the fascist coup attempt.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (17 children)

No, it's not pateoc anything. The cpusa is haunted by patsoc obsession. This is real leftists not caring about liberal drama.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Nobody here supports the hogs come on now you know that. We just don't really think it matters like libs do. A fascist coup looks like 2000, not 2020.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What is PatSoc? Jan 6th was just a dumb spectacle. A cop died, a guy tased his balls and shit was smeared in the capitol building.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago

I'm definitely interested in a political documentary from the studio that produced a film called "Civil War" that had zero understanding of politics in it

Also Pluto please for the love of God read some theory

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

if it weren't for rule six this would go directly to the dunk tank

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're wrong, I would absolutely post this to the dunk tank if it weren't for rule six.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

This is hurtful and I thought you were better than this.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't even have amazon prime so I would have had to pay to rent it anyway, subscriptionless chads stay winning

edit: twenty bucks? lmfao hell no

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, definitely pirate it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Here's the entire article:


The Sixth, a new documentary about the January 6 insurrection from an Oscar-winning filmmaking duo, was intended to be released on Amazon’s Prime Video. Instead, the A24 documentary is only available for premium rental, and the studio hasn’t even bothered with promoting it.

Directed by Sean Fine and Andrea Nix Fine (LFG), and produced in collaboration with A24, The Sixth revisits the 2021 insurrection on the U.S. Capitol, led by far-right Trump supporters who believed the 2020 election was “stolen,” from the perspective of six public service workers: Maryland congressman Jamie Raskin, congressional aide Erica Loewe, photographer Mel D. Cole, and three police officers. On May 3—the day The Sixth was released—Politico published a report questioning the absence of marketing for the documentary and the strange, seemingly last-minute change in release strategy.

Amazon denies having set a release date for The Sixth, but several people who spoke with Politico said they’d been told the documentary would be released on Prime Video—free to subscribers—on May 3. “The subjects were all told that the movie would be available on Prime starting at the beginning of May, and I was certainly telling that to people because the premiere was completely sold out,” Raskin told Politico. “I was telling people they’d be able to access it on Prime Video. And then the Fines told us that although that was the original understanding, it was now not going to be available for streaming on Prime Video and people would have to pay for it. That obviously will change by millions the number of people who will see it.”

As journalist Michael Schaffer was putting the story together, he noticed that The Sixth was not included on A24’s website alongside other upcoming releases. When he reached out for comment, the film suddenly appeared on the website, where A24 describes it as “a testament to the importance of truth.” But how important can that truth be when A24 and/or Amazon is ensuring far fewer people are able to see it? The Sixth was, as promised, released on May 3. However, the Fines’ documentary is only available to rent, and only for the premium rental fee of $19.99.

Although the Fines seemed hesitant to criticize A24, which bankrolled the doc for an undisclosed sum (per the report, the budget was likely in the seven-figure range), Sean Fine commented on the sudden release change:

“We’re artists,” Sean Fine said. “You make something and somebody tells you it’s going to be in a museum — and then all of a sudden, it’s like, no, no, it’s only in this other room of the museum, and you have to pay more to go see it. You wonder why. Or if they say we’re going to keep your painting in a closet for a while and we’re going to bring it out when we think it’s good for people to see it. So it’s like, ‘Why is that?’”

It’s particularly odd for A24 to shy away from a wider release push for The Sixth given its recent marketing efforts for Civil War, Alex Garland’s vision of a not-too-distant future in which the U.S., fractured by unspecified political issues, has devolved into war. As Schaffer notes in his reporting, The Sixth takes a similarly less granular approach to the politics of January 6, instead focusing on workers whose typical day at the office was violently upended by an insurrection.

Is it that A24, a distributor known for releasing avant garde indies and challenging genre films, is apprehensive about alienating a large percentage of the general moviegoing public? That seems too dissonant to be true, though I suppose it could be. Or is it that Amazon, a company headed by a billionaire whose continued wealth relies on conservative politics, isn’t particularly inclined to ensure The Sixth is seen by the widest audience possible? That sounds more correct, but it still doesn’t explain why A24 isn’t promoting a film it invested millions of dollars in producing.

As Schaffer writes for Politico, Amazon’s handling of The Sixth is a smart business decision, but that’s “a notion that ought to concern Americans of all stripes.”

“A shared set of facts is pretty essential to a functioning society,” Schaffer continues. “We stopped getting our facts from the same place long ago, but burying something because it might anger people during election season seems bad in a new way.”

With seven months until the 2024 presidential election, each day it becomes increasingly clear that we are laboring under the illusion of choice, and any narratives to the contrary—any authors who dare observe our political landscape with clear eyes—should either be dismissed by the right as wholesale fabrications or suppressed by the left for undermining the person we all have to vote for, or else.

(featured image: A24)

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I already know the chapo episode reviewing this is gonna be called "Views From The Sixth"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›