this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
6 points (100.0% liked)

Tucson Politics

200 readers
16 users here now

A respectful forum for Tucson's political discourse. Discuss local policies, debate civic matters, or get to know your representatives. Emphasizing civility, we aim to foster a productive space for political exchange. Let's discuss, not dispute.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  Four people arrested during a November protest at the University of Arizona's Tech Park argued trespassing charges should dismissed because they were exercising their sincere beliefs and are protected under a federal law intended to protect religious freedom.
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's an... interesting defense.

Under Arizona law, a person can be shielded from prosecution if they establish three elements: an otherwise illegal action or refusal to act is motivated by a religious belief; that belief is sincerely held, and the government's actions substantially burdens their exercise of their religious beliefs.

Points 1 and 2 - I can grant both of those without a second thought.

Point 3 - eehhhhhhh, I'm not too sure. I can understand the argument, but I'm really not convinced that their exercise of religious beliefs were at risk.

I'd think it would be far easier to work with an intent angle here. Especially since, as the article notes, the area in question could be reasonably mistaken for public property.

It's not to say I don't think the charges should be dropped - I think they should. I'm just not convinced the defense chose a winning argument.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

This is precisely where that law applies! Thanks for the excellent example.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Time for things to start popping off