this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
262 points (99.6% liked)

Beehaw Support

2857 readers
1 users here now

Support and meta community for Beehaw. Ask your questions about the community, technical issues, and other such things here.

A brief FAQ for lurkers and new users can be found here.

Our September 2024 financial update is here.

For a refresher on our philosophy, see also What is Beehaw?, The spirit of the rules, and Beehaw is a Community


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.


if you can see this, it's up  

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

hey folks, we'll be quick and to the point with this one:

we have made the decision to defederate from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works. we recognize this is hugely inconvenient for a wide variety of reasons, but we think this is a decision we need to take immediately. the remainder of the post details our thoughts and decision-making on why this is necessary.

we have been concerned with how sustainable the explosion of new users on Lemmy is--particularly with federation in mind--basically since it began. i have already related how difficult dealing with the explosion has been just constrained to this instance for us four Admins, and increasingly we're being confronted with external vectors we have to deal with that have further stressed our capabilities (elaborated on below).

an unfortunate reality we've also found is we just don't have the tools or the time here to parse out all the good from all the bad. all we have is a nuke and some pretty rudimentary mod powers that don't scale well. we have a list of improvements we'd like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possible--but we're unanimous in the belief that we can't wait on what we want to be developed here. separately, we want to do this now, while the band-aid can be ripped off with substantially less pain.

aside from/complementary to what's mentioned above, our reason for defederating, by and large, boils down to:

  • these two instances' open registration policy, which is extremely problematic for us given how federation works and how trivial it makes trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior;
  • the disproportionate number of moderator actions we take against users of these two instances, and the general amount of time we have to dedicate to bad actors on those two instances;
  • our need to preserve not only a moderated community but a vibe and general feeling this is actually a safe space for our users to participate in;
  • and the reality that fulfilling our ethos is simply not possible when we not only have to account for our own users but have to account for literally tens of thousands of new, completely unvetted users, some of whom explicitly see spaces like this as desirable to troll and disrupt and others of whom simply don't care about what our instance stands for

as Gaywallet puts it, in our discussion of whether to do this:

There's a lot of soft moderating that happens, where people step in to diffuse tense situations. But it's not just that, there's a vibe that comes along with it. Most people need a lot of trust and support to open up, and it's really hard to trust and support who's around you when there are bad actors. People shut themselves off in various ways when there's more hostility around them. They'll even shut themselves off when there's fake nice behavior around. There's a lot of nuance in modding a community like this and it's not just where we take moderator actions- sometimes people need to step in to diffuse, to negotiate, to help people grow. This only works when everyone is on the same page about our ethos and right now we can't even assess that for people who aren't from our instance, so we're walking a tightrope by trying to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. That isn't sustainable forever and especially not in the face of massive growth on such a short timeframe.

Explicitly safe spaces in real life typically aren't open to having strangers walk in off the street, even if they have a bouncer to throw problematic people out. A single negative interaction might require a lot of energy to undo.

and, to reiterate: we understand that a lot of people legitimately and fairly use these instances, and this is going to be painful while it's in effect. but we hope you can understand why we're doing this. our words, when we talk about building something better here, are not idle platitudes, and we are not out to build a space that grows at any cost. we want a better space, and we think this is necessary to do that right now. if you disagree we understand that, but we hope you can if nothing else come away with the understanding it was an informed decision.

this is also not a permanent judgement (or a moral one on the part of either community's owner, i should add--we just have differing interests here and that's fine). in the future as tools develop, cultures settle, attitudes and interest change, and the wave of newcomers settles down, we'll reassess whether we feel capable of refederating with these communities.

thanks for using our site folks.

(page 12) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

is there a github issue or list that describes specifically which moderation tools would be needed to deal with the kinds of issues that are appearing?

I just created my own community for the first time and as a new moderator I'd like to start learning more about the tools that are available, and which tools some more long-time mods feel are required to adequately run a community

I know part of the reddit outrage is over mod-tools, but I was never a mod over there so I'm oblivious to the sort of tasks that are routinely required (other than banning individuals)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

thank you for this community! i may not back a lot of what beehaw stands for but this is very welcomed!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm pretty new here so dunno how much it counts, but for what it's worth I think it's a good idea. I've recently seen quite a few users that have been posting from these instances and it seemed to me like they are just trying to instigate conflict or drama rather than build a community. The way they have write is aggressive and rude but not enough to break any specific rules, which must be hell to moderate. The mods here have been amazing so far so if this will help them, I'm all for it.

~~Besides, it shouldn't affect users too much - we can still manually go and subscribe to defederated instances and see that in the "subscribed" feed, right? This just means it's not discoverable through "All", and vice versa.~~

edit: I was wrong, it seems defederating completely stops content flow between instances, the things I've been seeing on subscribed page is old stuff from before the defederation. Still, a bit tricky but not insurmountable if it makes for a better sense of community in the end.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This seems like a bad decision honestly. If lemmy is to have any chance of replacing reddit open registration has to be the standard

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

If lemmy is to have any chance of replacing reddit open registration has to be the standard

we--Beehaw specifically--are not interested in being a replacement to Reddit for an endless number of reasons. if that's the primary goal people are after (and not just like a secondary motivation or something), they're already on the wrong instance and there are countless others which they can sign up on to fill the void.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How does that square with beehaw gaining significant numbers of users as part of reddit's recent migration? They wouldn't be looking for somewhere to join if they felt like reddit would continue to work for them, and I'd say that automatically makes replacing reddit their primary goal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Users applying to join this instance need to answer a question about why they want to join this instance in particular. If they didn't, they didn't get in. There are several posts about the beehaw instance philosophy on the sidebar, and users are explicitly encouraged to read them before applying. We're pretty explicit about not trying to be a 1-to-1 replacement for reddit here. If a user is looking for that, they should sign up with an instance that better fits those aims.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Has this taken place yet? I can still see community post from lemmy.world. Also, sending love to the mod team. Sounds overwhelming!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They have a post on the lemmy.world community which explains this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

A good explanation of the technical side of defederation and the implications: Lemmy.world - How the beehaw defederation affects us

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I respect this decision. It couldn’t have been an easy one to make, but I appreciate the mods taking the time to explain exactly why it was made while also leaving the door open for refederating in the future.

The community that the mods are trying to build / maintain here is the reason I chose to join this instance. The mods truly seem to care about the well-being of this community and are passionate about it. I’m just glad to be apart of it and hope it continues to grow!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Thank you all for what you are doing to build up this nice, safe, open, and fun community space for all of us!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›