this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
99 points (99.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4979 readers
314 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Imaging thinking that fining people who've got absolutely zero money in the first place is going to solve the issue

Morons

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is designed to appeal to their core vote base, who are largely morons, and isn't intended to fix anything. With the local elections coming up, expect to see lots more moronic policies as they attempt to get the morons out to vote for them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly. They'll tell their base that this is for the greater good.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

The greater good.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well they could just go to their daddies second home, no ones using it in the spring ya?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Hang on, if they continue to privatise prisons so that the incarcerated are forever in debt for their keep and also provide a cheap labour force for more private companies then surely it's a win-win for this government.

They maybe a ruthless, incompetent bunch of bastards but they won't miss a business opportunity!

Time to get rid.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Sir, the people are so poor after all your cuts that they have to sleep on the streets, some of them have frozen to death, what should we do?"

"Take their money!"

"But sir, if they had money then they'd not be dead"

"TAKE THEIR MONEY!"

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

Rock bottom is apparently not deep enough for these fucks.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

Another reason to say…….

FUCK THE TORIES, YOU ABSOLUTE SCUM

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

I fuckin hate rich people

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

I thought Cruella Braverman was no longer in the cabinet.

Seriously, these Tories seem to think that leadership is about being cruel and heartless bullies.

Long over due to get rid.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

What about fining the person who is squatting in Number 10?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

You have failed at capitalism, STRAIGHT TO JAIL!! /s

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What does rough sleeping mean? Homelessness?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

It's basically to differentiate 'homeless' as in all the people without a home, including those in hostels, sofa surfing, staying with friends, etc from the sleep outside kinda people. Rough sleepers are the latter.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Instead of Elon's jet tracker, can we make a website that tells people which of a given MPs properties they are not staying in on a given night?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Rishi Sunak is facing a Tory revolt over plans to criminalise homelessness in a key crime bill this year.

The prime minister risks a backbench rebellion when MPs vote on the Criminal Justice Bill, which would give police the power to fine or move “nuisance” rough sleepers.

Asked by Times Radio whether he would back the bill as it stands, business minister Kevin Hollinrake said: “Those things are not within my auspices.

The plans as they stand would grant police and local authority workers new powers to order beggars to move on while encouraging them to make use of accommodation services and mental health support.

“Everyone at risk of sleeping rough should have a right to suitable emergency accommodation, and to end homelessness for good it must invest in genuinely affordable social homes – we need 90,000 a year.”

“These provisions provide a civil route to engage with rough sleepers to help them to take up offers of support and only criminalise any non-compliance with a lawfully made direction, notice or order.”


The original article contains 761 words, the summary contains 172 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

These being tories, are we sure the rebels don't think the policy should be MORE moronically evil?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think this is about trying to get money out of the homeless, I think it's the adjacent power to move them on. In other words, homeless people living in urban centres can be bused out to brownbelt or industrial estates so they don't clutter up 'nice' town centres with their unpleasant presence. This is why it will appeal to their voter base. They won't have to see rough sleepers anymore. There will be no more homeless people camped outside Waitrose.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I sometimes twist my ankle at night.