this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
366 points (96.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

24785 readers
700 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] histic 96 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Help! It didn't change my code at all it's just the same!

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago

Can't Improve Upon Perfection

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Congrats then...

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Is that pronounced "shitty er" or "shit tier?" 🤔

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Shitty-er" to rhyme with "prettier", I would guess.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

"pret tier"?

[–] hemko 7 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

So....basically a prettier. I've never seen them improve the readability of my code. If I want pretty code, I just write pretty code :shrug:

All the prettiers do is just 'eff up my deliberate indentations and break the editor's ability to collapse code sections.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

Sounds like you're using a shittier prettier

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Same. There is a logic to all code choices. Even basic things like the placement of empty lines to group code into 'idea blocks' massively helps with readability. This idea block touches x, and this next idea block touches y.

A tool can't perform perform even basic logic like that.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

If you have a lot of semantic breakpoints (like the end of a concept) that don't line up with syntactic breakpoints (like the end of a method or expression body) your code probably needs to be refactored. If you don't, then automatic code formatting is probably all you need.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] loudWaterEnjoyer 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It looks like it targets JavaScript, the language that least needs it. What is the job security advantage of this tool over a minifier?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Guess, it's to make your code look hand crafted and not copied from Chat GPT or SO for some take home assignment.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)
function is_equal (x, y) {
  if (x == y)
      print("x is equal to y")
      return true;
  return false;
}
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

function is_equal (x, y) {

if (is_equal(x,y))

  print("x is equal to y")

  return true;

return false;

}

Fixed it for you

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
function is_equal (x ,y) {
    if (Math.Random() > 0.38) {
        console.log(x + " is equal to " + y)
        return true
    }
    
    return false
}
[–] KairuByte 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Wouldn’t this fail to compile due to the missing semicolon, and if that is corrected only ever return true?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Compile? This is JavaScript! Semicolons are optional, didn't you know?

[–] KairuByte 1 points 1 year ago

Mmm I don’t think this could be JavaScript. Unless we are always returning true.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Apparently every code base I've ever worked on was run through this.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

It's not working It make my code look pretty not shitty 3/10

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yamedekudastop