this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
194 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13956 readers
631 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As pointed out in the article, that would definitely help but wouldn't be sufficient.

Again, the proposed system would be non-exploitative. It would not incentivize the poor and desperate to donate.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Say it with me

Calling a system nonexploitative

DOES NOT MAKE IT NON EXPLOITATIVE

Incentivizing people starving and homeless to have their ORGANS Taken in exchange for MONEY FOR FOOD AND RENT

is, and I cannot stress this enough

EXPLOITATIVE

We have a system, capitalism, where some people are poor or homeless or a thousand other situations where these people are faced with the options of do crime or starve to death, with this now that option is do crime, starve to death, or sell your organs! Yaaay we solved poverty!!!!!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yo, cool your jets. I think we're talking past each other. The system in question isn't going to give any money to homeless people even if they donate their kidney. That's what I mean by non-exploitative.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're probably right, I do not intend any harm towards you I'm just mad in general