this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
415 points (98.4% liked)

Open Source

40676 readers
178 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For me it is the note taking/PKMS tool SilverBullet.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

Actually you're kinda right, their own license doesn't allow commercial redistribution (kinda similar with CC:NC) which make them not open source. I personally have no problems with that though.

[–] ShadowCat 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

@ShadowCat It restricts distribution and modification. You can't create derivative works. So it is "Look but don't touch". Not libre.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It is open source. But the license is not foss at the moment. They expresed their desire to make something that send revenue to creators

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

@isthereanydeal therefore it's not open source. See for something to be called "open source" it needs a bit more than just for the code to be readable. The only people who define open source as source readable are the people who don't want to create open source software.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There's a clear difference between open source and free open source software. It is open source but the licence is not "free". Not entirely at least

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

@isthereanydeal Nope. That distinction only appeared when big companies kinda became afraid of open source software, so they wanted to redefine the term, create some confusion, corrupt it..

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

You may have a point but there's a difference anyway

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Did you unselect your upvote?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@heyoni I'm commenting from mastodon, I don't even see any upvotes. Someone just started downvoting me because they ran out of arguments 🤷‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

That must be why. On lemmy, like reddit you automatically upvote your own comments. Yours was at 0 probably cause mastodon doesn't do that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Open source is when the source code is available.

Free software is when the source is available and the license lets you exercise your 4 freedoms.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@n0x0n You are wrong though: https://opensource.org/osd

> Introduction
> Open source doesn’t just mean access to the source code.

Literally the first sentence.

The definition you are using is being spread by the likes of Meta and Amazon.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Taking only a part of my post does not make sense in this context.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

@n0x0n Providing an authoritative source which directly contradicts your statement, that does not make any sense to you? I'm sorry then.