this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
13 points (100.0% liked)

..:: tchncs ::..

1487 readers
2 users here now

Your friendly https://tchncs.de/ community! Discuss whats happening in the tchncs world and/or just use it as a community forum.

German and english allowed.

If you are looking for a way to support tchncs, please check out https://tchncs.de/donate


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As far as I see that instance is a far-right cess pool. Everything I've got from that instance were low-quality transphobic "news articles".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (26 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

Read up. Then punch a nazi. Don't need that shit anywhere in society.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (22 children)

While it's crucial to oppose harmful ideologies like Nazism, we must be wary of how we define such harmful groups. If we broaden these definitions arbitrarily, we risk encapsulating people who merely differ politically, diluting the term's significance and unjustifiably alienating individuals. In doing so, we inadvertently shrink our own communities, polarizing society to the extent where a moderate viewpoint might be mistaken for extremism. Right-leaning communities fall into this trap as well, resulting in fragmented realities where each group exists in its own echo chamber. This division deepens societal fissures and undermines moderate views, which, in my belief, are grounded in reality and thus instrumental in achieving balanced discourse.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You're not entirely wrong, but when we are actually talking about actual literal self-declared fascists who are obviously talking and acting fascistic, then it definitely does apply. This is a long way past any sort of grey area, dude!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

This is where the need for nuance comes in. If we were dealing with a platform overrun by advocates for genocide, then defederation would be a reasonable step. But the lack of nuance creates an issue. If any perspective slightly outside your tolerance threshold is immediately labeled as Nazi, where do we draw the line? At what point on the right or the left spectrum does a viewpoint become unacceptable? The challenge lies in defining these boundaries and promoting dialogue without promoting hate.

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)