chapotraphouse

13908 readers

628 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Is there a lore reason why American elections are so convoluted? (lemm.ee)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Are they stupid?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (4 children)

In England, at this day, if elections were open to all classes of people, the property of the landed proprietors would be insecure. An agrarian law would soon take place. If these observations be just, our government ought to secure the permanent interests of the country against innovation. Landholders ought to have a share in the government, to support these invaluable interests and to balance and check the other. They ought to be so constituted as to protect the minority of the opulent against the majority. The senate, therefore, ought to be this body; and to answer these purposes, they ought to have permanency and stability.

—James Madison

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago

Also Madison.

The second method will be exemplified in the federal republic of the United States. Whilst all authority in it will be derived from, and dependent on the society, the society itself will be broken into so many parts, interests, and classes of citizens, that the rights of individuals, or of the minority, will be in little danger from interested combinations of the majority.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Shocker there what “tyranny of the majority” actually meant.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, it makes much more sense when taken in the context of them all being wealthy landowners, many of whom owned slaves

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

he-admit-it

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

our government ought to secure the permanent interests of the country against innovation.

We really are living up to what the founding fathers wanted whodathunkit joker-amerikkklap