this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
334 points (97.7% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

7980 readers
776 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

This is exactly why I decided to never ride a two-wheeled bicycle and just get on a motorcycle! I didn't have the exact thing, so what's the point, right?

Edit: to be clear, my point here is that we shouldn't shit on people who want to practice a thing, particularly if some component of it is rare or expensive, before they have all of the things they need to make it happen. I imagine I took this too literally, but we should celebrate the people who try and practice and want to nail it when they can, particularly when one ingredient they may want may come at significant cost and/or rarity.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Shitting on it? It's just that "making edibles" without the active substance is... just cooking/baking.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I guess it's how you read the response. I took it as "you idiot, that's just baking" but I guess there are less awful interpretations.