this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
258 points (99.6% liked)
food
22637 readers
1 users here now
Welcome to c/food!
The place for all kinds of food discussion: from photos of dishes you've made to recipes or even advice on how to eat healthier.
Animal liberation is essential to any leftist movement.
Image posts containing animal products must have nfsw tag and add a content warning (CW:Meat/Cheese/Egg) ,and try to post recipes easily adaptable for vegan.
Posts that contain animal products may receive informative comments regarding animal liberation, and users may disengage by telling a commenter that the original poster wants to, "disengage".
Off-topic, Toxic, inflammatory, aggressive debating, and meta (community rules, site rules, moderators,etc ) posts or comments will be removed.
Please be sure to read the Code of Conduct and remember we are all comrades here. Share all your delicious food secrets.
Ingredients of the week: Mushrooms,Cranberries, Brassica, Beetroot, Potatoes, Cabbage, Carrots, Nutritional Yeast, Miso, Buckwheat
Cuisine of the month:
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You're the one who made a grammatical mistake when making an allusion to "aseptic language", it was too good to let slide.
Why are you so arrogant? What gives you the authority, intellectual or otherwise, to describe folk etymology as "nonsense", or to decree whether someone is "entitled to a more gentle correction"?
This is pure debate perversion because now we're talking about muh entymology when it's really about you being rude and condescending. Being correct about something is no excuse to be an asshole. This is why I don't like you white academics.
Individualism again. It's not about any singular person, it's about you crackers not being so arrogant and dismissive towards cultural lore. You can say that something is factually right or wrong, but being an asshole about it is uncalled for. And yes I am tone policing because of your behaviour.
It's not your culture so do be respectful about "correcting" it as a white, or do kindly shut up.
I don't need authority to decide what an appropriate mode of interaction in various settings is. The same way you don't need to be invested by any authority to decide you're the scourge of the western academic. You can just do that and weird everyone out in the process.
And as we've already established, I was mirroring what members of the actual culture of origin described it as.
Who was I an asshole to?
I will, as ever, do what I think is best.
Individualism yet again.
Ok so you switched from chauvinistically making normative statements about folk entymology being objectively "nonsense", to, when asked about what "authority" you have to make such arrogant claims, "that's just how I talk in this setting bro".
That's too grandiose, I'm not unky ted. And not "western academics" in general JFL reading comprehension not found.
Being a normie is overrated.
You, as a white person, only get to cite their descriptions as such and nothing more. We addressed this earlier.
Ok.
And yet, I did otherwise.
Aaaand now we're going to go into more debate perversion about the definition of proper citation methods and timelines to avoid the fact that your 2nd post was literally just you calling the lore "nonsense" without any such descriptive receipts included within. Good job buddy boyo, way to weasel your way out of this one.
I'd be very interested to know what constitutes your definition of lore, actually.
:smuglord:
JFL nice try, Jack, but not a chance, go have a wank somewhere else.
Is it possible to move further and further away from things that don't exist?
"It is impossible for one to see even a mountain in front of him when his head is firmly burrowed into his own ass."
This kind of thing is why I prefer Laozi.
Indeed, to taste the Vinegar and find sweetness, what a man he was. His teachings should be remembered for 10,000 years at least.