chapotraphouse

I see this from the other side, that wildly reductive takes are being intentionally utilized to dismiss flat out murder. Essentially, the message comes across as "senseless violence is only bad when it happens to me; it's justified when I do it".

That said, the Palestinian situation is beyond fucked. Israel is and has been committing mass violence against millions of people on an enormous scale for decades, and it isn't shocking that that could radicalize people. The problem is that that's exactly what Nettanyahu and his cabinet of authoritarian fuckheads want, because it gives them the narrative they need to have their genocide. There's a reason Nettanyahu was urging people to find HAMAS (spoiler alert: it's not that he supports Palestinian freedom). And before I get the inevitable "So what's your solution, huh?" Well, maybe a first step could be let's all agree that killing non-combatants is fucking wrong no matter who's doing it. I know I'm going to get a wise-ass remark about how I just don't understand, it's okay when MY side murders non-combatants, what else should we be expected to do? My brother in Buddha, I don't think deleting unarmed civilians is going to cause the collapse of the Israeli government OR HAMAS. You could always take a page from the early Russian revolution and start targeting the people actually responsible, maybe.