this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
2 points (62.5% liked)

Linux

58082 readers
128 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have been mostly an Arch and Fedora user but I am very impressed by Vanilla Os, it is clean and fast, their installer is beautiful and new, everything works very well, for example after a few day my last fedora install with gnome desktop was lagging a bit on my gaming laptop but I doesn't lag at all on Vanilla Os, it always feels fresh and clean. Anyone else experienced Vanilla Os, what are your thoughts about it ?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] voluntaryexilecat 1 points 2 years ago

I see no advantage in switching to VanillaOS (from Archlinux), and Ubuntu's tendendcy to ship everything in snaps does not make it better. Arch is swift and clean, snapshots (LVM) protect from broken updates, the archive allows rollbacks way into the past, the additional LTS Kernel bridges bugs in mainline. Rebuilding packages is easy with the available toolchain, and you can be sure every package is as vanilla as possible conpared to upstream.

Hiding complexity from the user just builds another layer of complexity that can break. I can fix an Arch or a Debian, but Vanilla sounds like it will break once you want to add a few sprinkles of chocolate.