this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
60 points (100.0% liked)

News

84 readers
2 users here now

Breaking news and current events worldwide.

founded 2 years ago
 

A prominent U.S. lawsuit to ban the abortion pill mifepristone has focused on the drug's safety and approval process. But the outcome may ultimately rest on a different issue: whether Ingrid Skop, an anti-abortion doctor in Texas, and other physicians behind the lawsuit can justify suing in the first place.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If courts were to adopt the plaintiffs’ argument for standing, these experts said, emergency room doctors could sue over almost any regulation that impacted their workload, from oversight of guns to alcohol to teen drivers.

I think this article really shows the ridiculousness if the doctor did have standing to sue like this. It really opens a big can of worms most of which conservatives would not enjoy

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

It only opens a big can of worms if you apply logic. The supreme court could (and has) made explicit carveouts (e.g. You can only sue over this one thing). Never underestimate how corrupt the court can be.