this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
1055 points (85.1% liked)
Firefox
20363 readers
17 users here now
/c/firefox
A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.
Rules
1. Adhere to the instance rules
2. Be kind to one another
3. Communicate in a civil manner
Reporting
If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Why?
I love it when people just flat out refuse to read the article. Why read when you can comment instead?
You could ignore my reply, but instead you decided to attack me. I don't know what's your problem, but it's between two years right in your head, so please leave me out of it.
Someone needs a nap. It'll be ok.
from the article...
I don't use brave and I am not interested in using it, so YMMV.
All those i figured
This one is interesting to me because it begins to explains why it has the same terrible clipart lions head logo as a bunch of deadend political parties, groups, and candidates. It seems pretty obvious now
Everyone who I've ever seen talk about using Brave has been a chud, so I always thought it was sus.
Is Vivaldi good for privacy? It is closed-source and I don't understand its business model.
Not according to PrivacyTests.org. It lacks a lot of state partitioning, amongst other things. Just FYI, the front end UI is closed source, but the backend/engine is open source, because they're just another chromium spin off.
exactly, there's a lot of trust involved in using Vivaldi. I don't know why someone recommends it over Brave in the name of privacy.