88
Both of these removals are tacit endorsement of ableism and racism and this mod should be removed.
(hexbear.net)
Also here is the head mod defending a transphobe/chaser https://hexbear.net/comment/3762972
You're right, that's why I started with "AKTHUALLY". I knew I was being pedantic and wanted to signal that. Nevertheless, I find it interesting that the two uses of the word share the same origin.
I can dream okay? Things make so much more sense when people follow logic. "Fuck" shouldn't be considered a curse because it isn't cursing anyone.
Profanity?
Sure I guess.
A curse?
No, dumbass (not you, I'm referring to an imaginary individual), it's not cursing anyone you fucko.
Why is blue, "blue"?
Because it had to be called something.
I know that you were looking for examples of language being illogical, but I wanna point out that while "fuck" is a good example, "blue" not so much. "Blue" is consistent with the internal logic of English (it's a name given to an otherwise unnamed color), but "fuck" being defined as a curse word isn't consistent with English's internal logic.
To curse something is to invoke some kind of metaphysical or supernatural power against someone as a form of punishment^1. Last I checked, there isn't a god, demon, angel, or other religious entity called, "fuck", "fucko", "fuckhead" or any other variation, and as such, it shouldn't be considered a curse word. Nor can "fuck" be considered a form of curse by itself. "Get fucked" could be considered a curse, but "fuck" by itself shouldn't be viewed as a curse.
Could it be considered profane? Sure, I guess, but I feel like that'd be watering down the definition of profane/profanity. However, you are correct it pointing out that it doesn't follow logic to label it a curse word.
In the future, an alternative to "blue" might be to point out read, read, red. Read and read are pronounced differently, but spelled the same. Read and red are pronounced the same, but spelled differently.
^1 there's an alternate definition for "curse" which goes:
However, that's extremely broad, as blaspheme refers to
And profane?
...right.
Interestingly, colors don't have to have distinct names. There are languages without a distinct color name for blue. English didn't have a distinct word for pink until the 17th century, when the word was borrowed from the name of a flower, or a distinct word for orange until 14th century when it was borrowed from the fruit. Even the word blue didn't enter english until 13th century (from french), although old english had a word for at least related hues.
I didn't know that, that's pretty interesting! Still, I mean, it doesn't technically go against any rules for the color blue to be called "blue" afaik.
Yeah, its more a "thats just how it is" sort of thing
Also, I think the coarse part of that definition is doing the work when it comes to fuck. And what is a coarse word? I'll know it when I see it.
I tend to think of a coarse word as something that feels coarse when it's spoken, like jerk or shrine; words that have a "ch", "sh", "zh" or similar sound. Fuck doesn't fit the bill though.
Edit: Oh, a good example from a previous reply I made, is "actually". "Actually" feels coarse to me, but then again, I tend to pronounce actually like "acschually", where the T makes a "sch" sound.
I think, in the definition, its more a social comentary. Coarse language comes from coarse people