Trigger Warning: Community contains mostly bad environmental news (not by choice!). Community may also feature stories about animal agriculture and/or meat. Until tagging is available, please be aware and click accordingly.

🪲

Aussie Zone Rules.

Golden rule - be nice. If you wouldn’t say it in front of your ~~grandmother~~ favourite tree, don’t post it.
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. You are allowed to denigrate invasive plants or animals.
Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here. Except invasive plants or animals.
No porn. Except photos of plants. Definitely not animals.
No Ads / Spamming. Except for photos or stories about plants and animals.
Nothing illegal in Australia. Like invasive plants or animals. Exotic microbes and invasive fungi also not welcome.
Make post titles descriptive with no swear words. Comments are a free for all using the above rules as a guide. Fuck invasive plants and animals.

🐝

/c/Aussie Environment acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the land, sea and waters, of the area that we live and work on across Australia. We acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture and pay our respects to their Elders past and present.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

More bark than bite as Labor debate turns nuclear (michaelwest.com.au)

submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A push by unions and climate activists to force Labor to take stronger action on social and environmental policy has largely fizzled out as heads turn towards a fight over nuclear submarines.

Labor also faced a push from its left flank to stop native logging and put in place more stringent methane emissions reduction targets for the agriculture sector.

The influential Labor Environment Action Network initially wanted to amend the policy platform but moved a watered-down motion.

Eyes have turned to Friday's foreign policy debate where the government is facing a sustained push from dissidents and some unions to scrap mentions of AUKUS and nuclear submarines from its policy platform.

Defence Minister Richard Marles will move to introduce a statement on the Australia-UK-US pact into the policy platform but some delegates want to use the debate to accuse Labor of abandoning its traditional anti-nuclear stance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

A push by unions and climate activists to force Labor to take stronger action on social and environmental policy has largely fizzled out as heads turn towards a fight over nuclear submarines.

CFMEU national secretary Zach Smith joined about 1000 protesters outside the conference, telling the crowd the union’s demand was clear – to leverage $290 billion over a decade from Australia’s largest companies.

Labor also faced a push from its left flank to stop native logging and put in place more stringent methane emissions reduction targets for the agriculture sector.

The party resolved to rewrite its 1992 forestry policy, expand plantation estates to meet the demand for sustainably sourced wood and develop an industry plan to grow jobs in the sector.

ALP national president Wayne Swan ran the true believers through Labor’s policy highlights since World War I before turning his focus to the new generation.

I'm a bot and I'm open source!