this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
630 points (80.3% liked)

Memes

52113 readers
475 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 years ago (2 children)

And I'm pretty sure it would be turn into a shitfest if I tried to discuss the rest of the issues because I know you see them with Marx colored glasses.

Honestly this bit makes me extremally curious what your response to the other two issues are. Do you think they're both good things? I just want to know what I'm dealing with here.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He didn't even know about Title 42 and its use by the biden admin to deport twice as many people as Trump, I doubt he has informed opinions on police funding and strike breaking lmao

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago (5 children)

And this circlejerk is why I block hexbear on the apps I have that allow me to. There is no point in continuing conversation at this point. I'm less than human to you and yours.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 years ago

???? You literally didn't know what Title 42 was, and you were spreading poorly researched misinformation about an important issue, also "less than human to you" ??? bro we're debating on an Internet forum chill out

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I'm less than human to you and yours.

Dude, you're commenting on a thread about the liberal tendency to write off communist human beings as literal robots, the irony of you being so bad at taking corrections that you immediately jumping weepily onto the cross and play the victim just to avoid having to type out "damn, I didnt know that" is powerful and embarassing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Dude, I was commenting on specific fabrications someone was spreading, and out came all the responders to tell me how ignorant I am because I disagree with them. I'm not a liberal who writes off communists. Neither "a liberal" nor "write off communist".

Do you believe it is possible for a person to be a communist and also spread something that is not 100% honest truth? Do you all take the Three Oaths?

Sorry, but no. Nice comic, if only it were accurate. You drew yourself with a chad face, so I lose.

Look, nothing personal, but you can still treat someone like shit just because other people treat you like shit.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Truly providing sources is the most violent thing one can do to a liberal

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago

The critical mistake was using "unbiased" sources like the LA times. Shoulda stuck with the original source material stalindidnothingwrong.cn

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Dude, I was commenting on specific fabrications someone was spreading

Like someone else said, it's incredible, you got proven wrong to your face, in public, and didn't even blink. Just erased the interaction from your memory to preserve what is evidently a load-bearing smugness on your part. You're like a terminator tbh, if you simply acquired a more factual worldview to argue from you'd be a posting juggernaut.

Look, nothing personal

Oh my bad nevermind. Great bit, carry onstalin-approval

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Like someone else said, it’s incredible, you got proven wrong to your face, in public, and didn’t even blink

By bringing up something that isn't deportation? Ya'll are willing to lie together. But as someone else JUST reminded me, you don't care about my vote. We socdems are going up against the wall with everyone else.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

Ahh. Right. Of course. Retreating in to semantics. It's only deportation when you're literally removed from a commercial port facility.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

We socdems are going up against the wall with everyone else.

Its so fucking funny that you'll concoct a whole politically illiterate persecution fantasy just to avoid having to admit you didn't know what Title 42 is. Do you also fake your death to get out of doing the dishes? You're the second lib to do this in as many days, you guys can stop being scared any time, I'm not gonna send the Stasi.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

No, I assure you incredible confidence in your own unfounded beliefs and complete ignorance of the depths of your ignorance is extremely human, as is retreating in to cliches and retrenching when you're confronted with evidence that contradicts your ideological beliefs.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Buddy you were proven wrong on various points and now you're pissing and shidding your pants saying we don't treat you as human?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not sure why I'm stupid enough to reply.

WRT police, the budgeting is not unprecedented. I, too, support defunding police, but as far as all the metrics I've seen, nothing about Biden's budget effect on police funding is out of the ordinary.

WRT the Union stuff, it's complicated. He used a law meant to protect the country for the way it was indended, and empowered 8 of 12 unions to sign a deal they agreed to. There has never been any evidence of overt or covert threat of actually arresting members of the other 4 unions if they did strike. You might disagree with that, but it was a bold faced lie to say he "(sic) striped one of the largest unions in the country of its right to strike, something Republicans haven’t managed to do since the Traffic Controller firings in the 80s"

You get to decide whether someone on your side lying is better or worse than someone who is merely far-left non-communist calling bullshit what it is. There is exactly one way to guarantee never having my vote, and it's lying.